» Articles » PMID: 33413295

Real-world Characteristics of Women with Endometriosis-related Pain Entering a Multidisciplinary Endometriosis Program

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Jan 8
PMID 33413295
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Women with endometriosis are commonly treated by their sole provider. In this single-provider model of care, women frequently report long diagnostic delays, unresolved pelvic pain, multiple laparoscopic surgeries, sequential consultations with numerous providers, and an overall dissatisfaction with care. The emergence of multidisciplinary endometriosis centers aims to reduce diagnostic delays, improve pain management, and promote patient satisfaction; however, baseline data at the time of presentation to a multidisciplinary center are lacking.

Methods: A real-world, retrospective, single-site, cross-sectional study of women with surgically confirmed and/or clinically diagnosed endometriosis generated baseline data for a planned longitudinal assessment of multidisciplinary care of endometriosis. The primary objective was to determine the proportion of patients experiencing mild, moderate, or severe pain for dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP), and dyspareunia at entry into a multidisciplinary endometriosis clinic. Also explored were relationships between pain scores and clinical endpoints obtained from electronic medical records.

Results: More than half (59%) of the study participants (n = 638) reported experiencing pelvic pain for ≥ 5 years. Pain intensity was highest for patients reporting dysmenorrhea, followed by NMPP, and dyspareunia. Significant correlations were observed between total pelvic pain and patient age (r = -0.22, p < 0.001, n = 506) and number of previous healthcare providers (r = 0.16, p = 0.006, n = 292); number of previous providers and duration of pain (r = 0.21, p = < 0.0001, n = 279); and duration of pain and years since diagnosis (r = 0.60, p < 0.001, n = 302). Mean pain scores differed significantly by age group for dysmenorrhea (p < 0.001), NMPP (p = 0.005), and total pelvic pain (p < 0.001), but not for dyspareunia (p = 0.06), with the highest mean pain scores reported among those < 30 years of age.

Conclusion: These real-world data indicate that in the single-provider model of care, unresolved pelvic pain is common among women with endometriosis. Alternative care models, including a multidisciplinary approach, need to be evaluated for improvements in clinical outcomes. These data also highlight the importance of addressing NMPP, which may be particularly troublesome for patients.

Citing Articles

An artificial intelligence approach for investigating multifactorial pain-related features of endometriosis.

Kiser A, Schliep K, Hernandez E, Peterson C, Yandell M, Eilbeck K PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0297998.

PMID: 38381710 PMC: 10881015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297998.


Evaluation of the effect of previous endometriosis surgery on clinical and surgical outcomes of subsequent endometriosis surgery.

Tummers F, Peltenburg S, Metzemaekers J, Jansen F, Blikkendaal M Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 308(5):1531-1541.

PMID: 37639036 PMC: 10520192. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07193-4.


Does Quality of Care (QoC) Perception Influence the Quality of Life (QoL) in Women with Endometriosis? Results from an Italian Nationwide Survey during Covid Pandemic.

Cofini V, Muselli M, Lolli C, Fabiani L, Necozione S Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(1).

PMID: 36612945 PMC: 9819574. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010625.


The combined impact of testosterone and Western-style diet on endometriosis severity and progression in rhesus macaques†.

Bishop C, Takahashi D, Luo F, Sidener H, Martin L, Gao L Biol Reprod. 2022; 108(1):72-80.

PMID: 36173894 PMC: 9843674. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioac183.


Lessons from implementing the Australian National Action Plan for Endometriosis.

Armour M, Avery J, Leonardi M, Van Niekerk L, Druitt M, Parker M Reprod Fertil. 2022; 3(3):C29-C39.

PMID: 35928674 PMC: 9346321. DOI: 10.1530/RAF-22-0003.


References
1.
Allaire C, Williams C, Bodmer-Roy S, Zhu S, Arion K, Ambacher K . Chronic pelvic pain in an interdisciplinary setting: 1-year prospective cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 218(1):114.e1-114.e12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.002. View

2.
De Graaff A, DHooghe T, Dunselman G, Dirksen C, Hummelshoj L, Simoens S . The significant effect of endometriosis on physical, mental and social wellbeing: results from an international cross-sectional survey. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(10):2677-85. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det284. View

3.
Lamvu G, Soliman A, Manthena S, Gordon K, Knight J, Taylor H . Patterns of Prescription Opioid Use in Women With Endometriosis: Evaluating Prolonged Use, Daily Dose, and Concomitant Use With Benzodiazepines. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133(6):1120-1130. PMC: 6553518. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003267. View

4.
Paganoni S, Nicholson K, Leigh F, Swoboda K, Chad D, Drake K . Developing multidisciplinary clinics for neuromuscular care and research. Muscle Nerve. 2017; 56(5):848-858. PMC: 5656914. DOI: 10.1002/mus.25725. View

5.
Giudice L . Clinical practice. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(25):2389-98. PMC: 3108065. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp1000274. View