» Articles » PMID: 33410877

Association of Intensive Endoscopic Screening Burden With Gastric Cancer Detection

Overview
Journal JAMA Netw Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Jan 7
PMID 33410877
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: The rapidly increasing number of gastric cancer examinations performed over a short period might influence screening performance. Accessing the association between calendar month and gastric cancer detection rates might improve policy and guide institutional support.

Objective: To evaluate the association between the increased number of examinations over a certain period and gastric cancer detection rates among a large population included in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP).

Design, Setting, And Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study used data from the KNCSP comprising 26 765 665 men and women aged 40 years or older who participated in the screening program between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020.

Exposures: Gastric cancer screening with endoscopy.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was monthly gastric cancer detection rates in the KNCSP. A negative binomial regression model was used to evaluate the association between the screening month and detection rates.

Results: In total, 21 535 222 individuals underwent endoscopy (mean [SD] age, 55.61 [10.61] years; 11 761 709 women [54.62%]). The quarterly number of participants was the highest in the last quarter of the study period (2013-2014: 4 094 951 [41.39%], 2015-2016: 4 911 629 [42.19%]); this proportion was 2.48 to 2.84 times greater than that of the first quarter. Cancer detection rates were the lowest in December (2013-2014: 0.22; 95% CI, 0.22-0.23; 2015-2016: 0.21; 95% CI, 0.21-0.22); this was approximately a 40.0% to 45.0% reduction compared with the rates in January. The age group was the significant factor for monthly detection rates. After adjustment for the age group and taking account of the number of screenings, the estimated coefficient range for the screening month was negative and the detection rate in December was significantly different than in January for both the consequent cycles (2013-2014: -0.05 to -0.18; P < .001; and 2015-2016: -0.06 to -0.19; P < .001). In the multivariable logistic model, the association of calendar month with detected cancer remained after adjusting for other confounding factors (December, 2013-2014: odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.87; P < .001; 2015-2016: odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.89; P < .001).

Conclusions And Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that the workload of endoscopists increased with the increasing number of examinations toward the end of the year, as demonstrated by the decreased cancer detection rates. These findings may help to improve gastric cancer detection rates of screening programs by controlling the monthly screening number and policy modifications.

Citing Articles

Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor.

Menini M, Hassan C Endosc Int Open. 2024; 12(11):E1342-E1344.

PMID: 39559416 PMC: 11573462. DOI: 10.1055/a-2451-8572.


Association of Intensive Endoscopic Burden with Esophageal Cancer Detection: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Lee Y, Lee E, Park B, Lee G, Lim S, Shin S Gut Liver. 2024; 19(1):59-68.

PMID: 39327841 PMC: 11736323. DOI: 10.5009/gnl240111.


A mathematical simulation model to determine the optimal endoscopic screening strategy for detection of H. pylori-naïve gastric neoplasms.

Ishibashi F, Okusa K, Tokai Y, Hirasawa T, Kawakami T, Mochida K Gastric Cancer. 2024; 27(5):1078-1087.

PMID: 38937306 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-024-01525-2.


Virtual biopsy using CT radiomics for evaluation of disagreement in pathology between endoscopic biopsy and postoperative specimens in patients with gastric cancer: a dual-energy CT generalizability study.

Liu Y, Zhao S, Wu Z, Liang H, Chen X, Huang C Insights Imaging. 2023; 14(1):118.

PMID: 37405591 PMC: 10323070. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01459-w.


Updated epidemiology of gastrointestinal cancers in East Asia.

Huang J, Lucero-Prisno 3rd D, Zhang L, Xu W, Wong S, Ng S Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023; 20(5):271-287.

PMID: 36631716 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-022-00726-3.


References
1.
Karimi P, Islami F, Anandasabapathy S, Freedman N, Kamangar F . Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014; 23(5):700-13. PMC: 4019373. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1057. View

2.
Harewood G, Chrysostomou K, Himy N, Leong W . Impact of operator fatigue on endoscopy performance: implications for procedure scheduling. Dig Dis Sci. 2008; 54(8):1656-61. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-008-0549-7. View

3.
Jun J, Choi K, Lee H, Suh M, Park B, Song S . Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in Reducing Gastric Cancer Mortality. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152(6):1319-1328.e7. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.029. View

4.
Sanaka M, Shah N, Mullen K, Ferguson D, Thomas C, McCullough A . Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 101(12):2726-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00887.x. View

5.
Lee S, Jun J, Suh M, Park B, Noh D, Jung K . Gastric cancer screening uptake trends in Korea: results for the National Cancer Screening Program from 2002 to 2011: a prospective cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(8):e533. PMC: 4554157. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000533. View