» Articles » PMID: 33404735

Social Facilitation of Alcohol Subjective Effects in Adolescents: Associations with Subsequent Alcohol Use

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2021 Jan 6
PMID 33404735
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Laboratory research in adults indicates that alcohol-related subjective effects are enhanced under some social conditions. However, it is unknown whether this "social facilitation" of alcohol effects occurs in adolescents and is associated with alcohol use in the natural ecology.

Objectives: We examined associations of social facilitation of alcohol-related subjective effects with subsequent alcohol use among a relatively high-risk group of adolescents who reported drinking alcohol both with friends and alone.

Methods: Los Angeles high school students from a prospective study (N = 142; 51% female; 10th graders) completed a baseline survey that assessed alcohol-related "positive" and "negative" subjective effects in two contexts: social (alcohol with friends) and solitary (alcohol alone); social facilitation was calculated as the difference between social and solitary. Students then completed five semi-annual surveys spanning 30 months (2014-2017) assessing 30-day alcohol use (days used, number of drinks, binge drinking).

Results: Greater social facilitation of positive effects was significantly associated with greater number of alcohol use days (RR [95% CI] = 1.48 [1.19, 1.82]; p < .001), greater number of drinks (RR [95% CI] = 1.38 [1.14, 1.66]; p = .001), and greater odds of binge drinking (OR [95% CI] = 1.75 [1.20, 2.57]; p = .004). Similar associations were found with social positive effects. There were no significant associations between solitary positive effects-or any negative effects-and alcohol use outcomes.

Conclusions: Social facilitation can be measured outside of the laboratory. Relatively high-risk drinking adolescents who are more susceptible to the social facilitation of subjective alcohol effects are more likely to use more alcohol and binge drink.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for early use of e-cigarettes and alcohol: Dimensions and profiles of temperament.

Hartmann S, Hayes T, Sutherland M, Trucco E Dev Psychopathol. 2021; 35(2):481-493.

PMID: 34924096 PMC: 9207150. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579421001565.

References
1.
Rodgers J, Buchanan T, Pearson C, Parrott A, Ling J, Hefferman T . Differential experiences of the psychobiological sequelae of ecstasy use: quantitative and qualitative data from an internet study. J Psychopharmacol. 2005; 20(3):437-46. DOI: 10.1177/0269881105058777. View

2.
Tucker J, Ellickson P, Collins R, Klein D . Does solitary substance use increase adolescents' risk for poor psychosocial and behavioral outcomes? A 9-year longitudinal study comparing solitary and social users. Psychol Addict Behav. 2006; 20(4):363-72. DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.4.363. View

3.
Martin C, Earleywine M, Musty R, Perrine M, Swift R . Development and validation of the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993; 17(1):140-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00739.x. View

4.
Morean M, Corbin W, Treat T . The Subjective Effects of Alcohol Scale: development and psychometric evaluation of a novel assessment tool for measuring subjective response to alcohol. Psychol Assess. 2013; 25(3):780-795. PMC: 3822039. DOI: 10.1037/a0032542. View

5.
King A, de Wit H, McNamara P, Cao D . Rewarding, stimulant, and sedative alcohol responses and relationship to future binge drinking. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011; 68(4):389-99. PMC: 4633413. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.26. View