» Articles » PMID: 33402218

Drivers of Realized Satellite Tracking Duration in Marine Turtles

Overview
Journal Mov Ecol
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Jan 6
PMID 33402218
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Satellite tags have revolutionized our understanding of marine animal movements. However, tags may stop transmitting for many reasons and little research has rigorously examined tag failure. Using a long-term, large-scale, multi-species dataset, we evaluated factors influencing tracking duration of satellite tags to inform study design for future tracking studies.

Methods: We leveraged data on battery status transmitted with location data, recapture events, and number of transmission days to probabilistically quantify multiple potential causes of failure (i.e., battery failure, premature detachment, and tag damage/fouling). We used a combination of logistic regressions and an ordinary linear model including several predictor variables (i.e., tag type, battery life, species, sex, size, and foraging region).

Results: We examined subsets of data from 360 satellite tags encompassing 86,889 tracking days deployed on four species of marine turtles throughout the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean, and Bahamas from 2008 to 2019. Only 4.1% of batteries died before failure due to other causes. We observed species-specific variation in how long tags remain attached: hawksbills retained 50% of their tags for 1649 days (95% CI 995-1800), loggerheads for 584 days (95% CI 400-690), and green turtles for 294 days (95% CI 198-450). Estimated tracking duration varied by foraging region (Caribbean: 385 days; Bahamas: 356; southern Gulf of Mexico [SGOM]: 276, northern Gulf of Mexico [NGOM]: 177). Additionally, we documented species-specific variation in estimated tracking duration among foraging regions. Based on sensor data, within the Gulf of Mexico, across species, we estimated that 50% of tags began to foul after 83 95% CI (70-120) days.

Conclusions: The main factor that limited tracking duration was tag damage (i.e., fouling and/or antenna breakage). Turtles that spent most of their time in the Gulf of Mexico had shorter tracking durations than those in the Bahamas and Caribbean, with shortest durations observed in the NGOM. Additionally, tracking duration varied by species, likely as a result of behaviors that damage tags. This information will help researchers, tag companies, permitting agencies, and funders better predict expected tracking durations, improving study designs for imperiled marine turtles. Our results highlight the heterogeneity in telemetry device longevity, and we provide a framework for researchers to evaluate telemetry devices with respect to their study objectives.

Citing Articles

Short-Term Effects of Attaching Animal-Borne Devices on the Behavior of Juvenile Green Turtles.

Robinson N, Donate-Ordonez R, Chatzievangelou D, Brooks A, Cuffley J, Fields C Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(12):e70707.

PMID: 39717630 PMC: 11664212. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70707.


Deep vs shallow: GPS tags reveal a dichotomy in movement patterns of loggerhead turtles foraging in a coastal bay.

Lamont M, Slone D, Reid J, Butler S, Alday J Mov Ecol. 2024; 12(1):40.

PMID: 38816732 PMC: 11140867. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-024-00480-y.


Novel Microsatellite Tags Hold Promise for Illuminating the Lost Years in Four Sea Turtle Species.

Candela T, Wyneken J, Leijen P, Gaspar P, Vandeperre F, Norton T Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38540001 PMC: 10967317. DOI: 10.3390/ani14060903.


Comparing acoustic and satellite telemetry: an analysis quantifying the space use of in Bimini, Bahamas.

Hardin E, Cullen J, Fuentes M R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(1):231152.

PMID: 38204794 PMC: 10776224. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231152.


Daily, seasonal, and long-distance movements inferred from Fastloc-GPS telemetry of immature green turtles (Chelonia mydas) at a high-latitude, mid-ocean developmental site.

Hardy R, Meylan A, Gray J, Meylan P PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0292235.

PMID: 38100458 PMC: 10723664. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292235.


References
1.
Hart K, Lamont M, Sartain A, Fujisaki I . Migration, foraging, and residency patterns for Northern Gulf loggerheads: implications of local threats and international movements. PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e103453. PMC: 4116210. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103453. View

2.
Hussey N, Kessel S, Aarestrup K, Cooke S, Cowley P, Fisk A . ECOLOGY. Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world. Science. 2015; 348(6240):1255642. DOI: 10.1126/science.1255642. View

3.
Frair J, Fieberg J, Hebblewhite M, Cagnacci F, DeCesare N, Pedrotti L . Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010; 365(1550):2187-200. PMC: 2894963. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0084. View

4.
Klaassen R, Hake M, Strandberg R, Koks B, Trierweiler C, Exo K . When and where does mortality occur in migratory birds? Direct evidence from long-term satellite tracking of raptors. J Anim Ecol. 2013; 83(1):176-84. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12135. View

5.
Hart K, Iverson A, Fujisaki I, Lamont M, Bucklin D, Shaver D . Sympatry or syntopy? Investigating drivers of distribution and co-occurrence for two imperiled sea turtle species in Gulf of Mexico neritic waters. Ecol Evol. 2019; 8(24):12656-12669. PMC: 6308884. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4691. View