» Articles » PMID: 33392721

CD34 and Bcl-2 As Predictors for the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer

Overview
Date 2021 Jan 4
PMID 33392721
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Successful neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) could improve the surgical resection rate and radical curability of patients with cervical cancer, but only a subset of patients benefits. Therefore, identifying predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of CD34 and Bcl-2 in the NACT effectiveness of cervical cancer.

Methods: Sixty-seven patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB3, IIA2 or IIB) were classified into two groups based on effective (n = 48) and ineffective (n = 19) response to NACT. Immunohistochemistry was employed to identify CD34 and Bcl-2 expression before and after NACT. We analyzed the associations between the pre-NACT expression of these two biomarkers and the response of NACT. The expression of these two biomarkers before and after NACT was also assessed and compared.

Results: More patients were CD34 positive expression before NACT in effective group compared to ineffective group (p = 0.005). However, no statistically significant difference in Bcl-2 expression before NACT were found between two groups (p = 0.084). In NACT effective group, the expression of both CD34 and Bcl-2 after NACT are down-regulated (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), while there are no statistical differences between the pre- and post-NACT expression of CD34 and Bcl-2 in NACT ineffective group (p = 0.453 and p = 0.317, respectively).

Conclusion: The positive CD34 expression before NACT may serve as a predictive biomarker for NACT of cervical cancer, but the pre-NACT expression of Bcl-2 is not an independent predictor. The down-regulated expression of these two indicators after NACT may indicate effective NACT.

Citing Articles

Case Report: Partial response to single-agent pembrolizumab in a chemotherapy-resistant metastatic pancreatic cancer patient with a high tumor mutation burden.

Dai M, Sheng J, Zhang Q, Wang J, Fu Q, Liang T Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1118633.

PMID: 36937383 PMC: 10016350. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1118633.


Comprehensive analysis of novel prognosis-related proteomic signature effectively improve risk stratification and precision treatment for patients with cervical cancer.

Ji X, Chu G, Chen Y, Jiao J, Lv T, Yao Q Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 307(3):903-917.

PMID: 35713693 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06642-w.

References
1.
Landoni F, Sartori E, Maggino T, Zola P, Zanagnolo V, Cosio S . Is there a role for postoperative treatment in patients with stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery? An Italian multicenter retrospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 132(3):611-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.010. View

2.
Aijaz M, Alam K, Maheshwari V, Hakim S, Kamal M . Clinicopathological study of role of CD34 expressions in the stroma of premalignant and malignant lesions of uterine cervix. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2018; 38:87-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2018.11.007. View

3.
Kontos C, Christodoulou M, Scorilas A . Apoptosis-related BCL2-family members: Key players in chemotherapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2013; 14(3):353-74. DOI: 10.2174/18715206113139990091. View

4.
Zhu T, Xu F, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Yang C, Cheng M . Measurement of molecular biomarkers that predict the tumor response in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers after dose-dense (biweekly) paclitaxel/carboplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(60):101087-101094. PMC: 5731857. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19686. View

5.
Tsuchida Y, Therasse P . Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST): new guidelines. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001; 37(1):1-3. DOI: 10.1002/mpo.1154. View