Safety and Immunogenicity of INO-4800 DNA Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2: A Preliminary Report of an Open-label, Phase 1 Clinical Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: A vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is of high urgency. Here the safety and immunogenicity induced by a DNA vaccine (INO-4800) targeting the full length spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 are described.
Methods: INO-4800 was evaluated in two groups of 20 participants, receiving either 1.0 mg or 2.0 mg of vaccine intradermally followed by CELLECTRA® EP at 0 and 4 weeks. Thirty-nine subjects completed both doses; one subject in the 2.0 mg group discontinued trial participation prior to receiving the second dose. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04336410.
Findings: The median age was 34.5, 55% (22/40) were men and 82.5% (33/40) white. Through week 8, only 6 related Grade 1 adverse events in 5 subjects were observed. None of these increased in frequency with the second administration. No serious adverse events were reported. All 38 subjects evaluable for immunogenicity had cellular and/or humoral immune responses following the second dose of INO-4800. By week 6, 95% (36/38) of the participants seroconverted based on their responses by generating binding (ELISA) and/or neutralizing antibodies (PRNT IC), with responder geometric mean binding antibody titers of 655.5 [95% CI (255.6, 1681.0)] and 994.2 [95% CI (395.3, 2500.3)] in the 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg groups, respectively. For neutralizing antibody, 78% (14/18) and 84% (16/19) generated a response with corresponding geometric mean titers of 102.3 [95% CI (37.4, 280.3)] and 63.5 [95% CI (39.6, 101.8)], in the respective groups. By week 8, 74% (14/19) and 100% (19/19) of subjects generated T cell responses by IFN-ɣ ELISpot assay with the median SFU per 10 PBMC of 46 [95% CI (21.1, 142.2)] and 71 [95% CI (32.2, 194.4)] in the 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg groups, respectively. Flow cytometry demonstrated a T cell response, dominated by CD8 T cells co-producing IFN-ɣ and TNF-α, without increase in IL-4.
Interpretation: INO-4800 demonstrated excellent safety and tolerability and was immunogenic in 100% (38/38) of the vaccinated subjects by eliciting either or both humoral or cellular immune responses.
Funding: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).
Gobel C, Heinze A, Heinze-Kuhn K, Karstedt S, Morscheck M, Tashiro L Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(2).
PMID: 40006661 PMC: 11861871. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13020113.
Jia S, Shao C, Cheng X, Pan H, Wang Z, Xia Y Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025; 21(1):2448405.
PMID: 39865693 PMC: 11776483. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2448405.
Vaccine Strategies Against RNA Viruses: Current Advances and Future Directions.
Hsiung K, Chiang H, Reinig S, Shih S Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 12(12.
PMID: 39772007 PMC: 11679499. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12121345.
Rational design of a DNA-launched live attenuated vaccine against human enterovirus 71.
Zhang R, He M, Zhou C, Xu Y, Tang W, Cao T Virol Sin. 2024; 39(5):812-820.
PMID: 39306193 PMC: 11738765. DOI: 10.1016/j.virs.2024.09.008.
COVID-19: vaccination, therapeutics and a review of the science and public health.
Shah S, Bhandari K, Shah A, Chaurasiya G Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(9):5343-5353.
PMID: 39239001 PMC: 11374161. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002374.