» Articles » PMID: 33385757

Examining the Effects of Problematic Alcohol Use on Cigarette Abstinence in Recently Diagnosed Cancer Patients Enrolled in a Cessation Trial: A Secondary Analysis

Overview
Journal Addict Behav
Date 2021 Jan 1
PMID 33385757
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Among people with cancer, dual alcohol and tobacco use increases risk for morbidity and mortality. Most smoking cessation clinical trials with this patient population have excluded individuals with problematic alcohol use. This investigation examined whether problematic alcohol use affects smoking cessation in cancer patients.

Methods: Mixed-methods secondary analysis of data from the Smokefree Support Study, a randomized-controlled trial examining the efficacy of Intensive (IT; n = 153) vs. Standard Treatment (ST; n = 150) for smoking cessation in newly diagnosed cancer patients. Problematic alcohol use was assessed at enrollment using the Cut-Down-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye-Opener (CAGE), weekly frequency of alcohol use and binge drinking measures. Alcohol use was categorized as: no current alcohol use, moderate and problematic use. The primary outcome was biochemically-confirmed cigarette abstinence at 6-months. A subset of patients (n = 72) completed qualitative exit-interviews.

Results: Among all participants, biochemically-confirmed cigarette abstinence rates were 25% (n = 32), 28% (n = 27), and 36% (n = 20) for participants reporting no current alcohol use, moderate use, and problematic use, respectively (p = 0.33). In logistic regression analysis, neither problematic alcohol use (AOR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.35-2.67, p = .94) nor the problematic use by study arm interaction (AOR = 2.22, 95% CI = 0.59-8.39, p = .24) were associated with biochemically-confirmed 6-month abstinence. Qualitatively, participants reported that drinking alcohol triggers urges to smoke.

Conclusion: Newly diagnosed cancer patients reporting problematic alcohol use were not less likely to quit smoking than those without. Additional research is needed to investigate whether problematic alcohol users may benefit from smoking and alcohol behavior change interventions at the time of cancer diagnosis.

References
1.
DiClemente C, Corno C, Graydon M, Wiprovnick A, Knoblach D . Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: A review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017; 31(8):862-887. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000318. View

2.
Ewing J . Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984; 252(14):1905-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.252.14.1905. View

3.
Park E, Ostroff J, Perez G, Hyland K, Rigotti N, Borderud S . Integrating tobacco treatment into cancer care: Study protocol for a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016; 50:54-65. PMC: 5035625. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.07.016. View

4.
Prochaska J, Delucchi K, Hall S . A meta-analysis of smoking cessation interventions with individuals in substance abuse treatment or recovery. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004; 72(6):1144-56. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1144. View

5.
Duffy S, Ronis D, Valenstein M, Lambert M, Fowler K, Gregory L . A tailored smoking, alcohol, and depression intervention for head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15(11):2203-8. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0880. View