» Articles » PMID: 33384838

Scope and Performance of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Orthodontic Diagnosis, Treatment Planning, and Clinical Decision-making - A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal J Dent Sci
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Jan 1
PMID 33384838
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/purpose: In the recent years artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized in the field of dentistry. The aim of this systematic review was to document the scope and performance of the artificial intelligence based models that have been widely used in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and predicting the prognosis.

Materials And Methods: The literature for this paper was identified and selected by performing a thorough search for articles in the electronic data bases like Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Google scholar, Scopus and Web of science, Saudi digital library published over the past two decades (January 2000-February 2020). After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 articles were read in full and critically analyzed. QUADAS-2 were adapted for quality analysis of the studies included.

Results: AI technology has been widely applied for identifying cephalometric landmarks, determining need for orthodontic extractions, determining the degree of maturation of the cervical vertebra, predicting the facial attractiveness after orthognathic surgery, predicting the need for orthodontic treatment, and orthodontic treatment planning. Most of these artificial intelligence models are based on either artificial neural networks (ANNs) or convolutional neural networks (CNNs).

Conclusion: The results from these reported studies are suggesting that these automated systems have performed exceptionally well, with an accuracy and precision similar to the trained examiners. These systems can simplify the tasks and provide results in quick time which can save the dentist time and help the dentist to perform his duties more efficiently. These systems can be of great value in orthodontics.

Citing Articles

Artificial Intelligence and Dentistry: The Future.

Prabhu V, Saidath K, Suvarna N, Mohtesham I, Shenoy S, Prabhu R J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025; 16(Suppl 5):S4257-S4261.

PMID: 40061754 PMC: 11888630. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1341_24.


Force-Driven Model for Automated Clear Aligner Staging Design Based on Stepwise Tooth Displacement and Rotation in 3D Space.

Yang S, Cheng Y Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001631 PMC: 11852307. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020111.


Artificial intelligence in dentistry-A review.

Ding H, Wu J, Zhao W, Matinlinna J, Burrow M, Tsoi J Front Dent Med. 2025; 4:1085251.

PMID: 39935549 PMC: 11811754. DOI: 10.3389/fdmed.2023.1085251.


Performance of artificial intelligence on cervical vertebral maturation assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sadeghi T, Ourang S, Sohrabniya F, Sadr S, Shobeiri P, Motamedian S BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):187.

PMID: 39910512 PMC: 11796225. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05482-9.


Evaluation of four machine learning methods in predicting orthodontic extraction decision from clinical examination data and analysis of feature contribution.

Huang J, Chan I, Wang Z, Ding X, Jin Y, Yang C Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1483230.

PMID: 39469520 PMC: 11513347. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1483230.


References
1.
Ribarevski R, Vig P, Vig K, Weyant R, OBrien K . Consistency of orthodontic extraction decisions. Eur J Orthod. 1996; 18(1):77-80. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/18.1.77. View

2.
Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, Mallett S, Deeks J, Reitsma J . QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(8):529-36. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. View

3.
Mario M, Abe J, Ortega N, Del Santo Jr M . Paraconsistent artificial neural network as auxiliary in cephalometric diagnosis. Artif Organs. 2010; 34(7):E215-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.00994.x. View

4.
Li P, Kong D, Tang T, Su D, Yang P, Wang H . Orthodontic Treatment Planning based on Artificial Neural Networks. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):2037. PMC: 6375961. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-38439-w. View

5.
Leonardi R, Giordano D, Maiorana F, Spampinato C . Automatic cephalometric analysis. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(1):145-51. DOI: 10.2319/120506-491.1. View