» Articles » PMID: 33384609

Heart Rate Dependency and Inter-Lead Variability of the T Peak - T End Intervals

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2021 Jan 1
PMID 33384609
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The electrocardiographic (ECG) assessment of the T peak-T end (Tpe) intervals has been used in many clinical studies, but several related physiological aspects have not been reported. Specifically, the sources of the Tpe differences between different ECG leads have not been systematically researched, the relationship of Tpe duration to underlying heart rate has not been firmly established, and little is known about the mutual correspondence of Tpe intervals measured in different ECG leads. This study evaluated 796,620 10-s 12-lead ECGs obtained from long-term Holters recorded in 639 healthy subjects (311 female) aged 33.8 ± 9.4 years. For each ECG, transformation to orthogonal XYZ lead was used to measure Tpe in the orthogonal vector magnitude (used as a reference for lead-to-lead comparisons) and to construct a three-dimensional T wave loop. The loop roundness was expressed by a ratio between its circumference and length. These ratios were significantly related to the standard deviation of Tpe durations in different ECG leads. At the underlying heart rate of 60 beats per minute, Tpe intervals were shorter in female than in male individuals (82.5 ± 5.6 vs 90.0 ± 6.5 ms, < 0.0001). When studying linear slopes between Tpe intervals measured in different leads and the underlying heart rate, we found only minimal heart rate dependency, which was not systematic across the ECG leads and/or across the population. For any ECG lead, positive Tpe/RR slope was found in some subjects (e.g., 79 and 25% of subjects for V2 and V4 measurements, respectively) and a negative Tpe/RR slope in other subjects (e.g., 40 and 65% for V6 and V5, respectively). The steepest positive and negative Tpe/RR slopes were found for measurements in lead V2 and V4, respectively. In all leads, the Tpe/RR slope values were close to zero, indicating, on average, Tpe changes well below 2 ms for RR interval changes of 100 ms. On average, longest Tpe intervals were measured in lead V2, the shortest in lead III. The study concludes that the Tpe intervals measured in different leads cannot be combined. Irrespective of the measured ECG lead, the Tpe interval is not systematically heart rate dependent, and no heart rate correction should be used in clinical Tpe investigations.

Citing Articles

Effects of Prediabetes on Ventricular Repolarization Markers in Electrocardiography.

Memioglu T, Inanir M, Toprak K, Gurler M Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 26(2):26266.

PMID: 40026516 PMC: 11868905. DOI: 10.31083/RCM26266.


Tpeak-Tend ECG Marker in Obesity and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.

Dykiert I, Florek K, Kraik K, Gac P, Poreba R, Poreba M Scientifica (Cairo). 2024; 2024:4904508.

PMID: 38962529 PMC: 11221957. DOI: 10.1155/2024/4904508.


The Effect of Obesity on Repolarization and Other ECG Parameters.

Dykiert I, Kraik K, Jurczenko L, Gac P, Poreba R, Poreba M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(12).

PMID: 38930116 PMC: 11205044. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123587.


Intra-subject stability of different expressions of spatial QRS-T angle and their relationship to heart rate.

Andrsova I, Hnatkova K, Toman O, Sisakova M, Smetana P, Huster K Front Physiol. 2022; 13:939633.

PMID: 36457310 PMC: 9708109. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.939633.


Demographic and Methodological Heterogeneity in Electrocardiogram Signals From Guinea Pigs.

Haq K, Cooper B, Berk F, Roberts A, Swift L, Posnack N Front Physiol. 2022; 13:925042.

PMID: 35721548 PMC: 9202081. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.925042.


References
1.
Kors J, van Herpen G . Measurement error as a source of QT dispersion: a computerised analysis. Heart. 1999; 80(5):453-8. PMC: 1728846. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.80.5.453. View

2.
Malik M, Hnatkova K, Novotny T, Schmidt G . Subject-specific profiles of QT/RR hysteresis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008; 295(6):H2356-63. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00625.2008. View

3.
Hnatkova K, Vicente J, Johannesen L, Garnett C, Strauss D, Stockbridge N . Detection of T Wave Peak for Serial Comparisons of JTp Interval. Front Physiol. 2019; 10:934. PMC: 6670189. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00934. View

4.
Fenichel R, Malik M, Antzelevitch C, Sanguinetti M, Roden D, Priori S . Drug-induced torsades de pointes and implications for drug development. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15(4):475-95. PMC: 1544371. DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03534.x. View

5.
Kors J, van Herpen G, Sittig A, van Bemmel J . Reconstruction of the Frank vectorcardiogram from standard electrocardiographic leads: diagnostic comparison of different methods. Eur Heart J. 1990; 11(12):1083-92. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059647. View