» Articles » PMID: 33383971

Histological and Radiological Features of a Four-Phase Injectable Synthetic Bone Graft in Guided Bone Regeneration: A Case Report

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Jan 1
PMID 33383971
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: Injectable synthetic bone grafts (ISBG) are widely used biomaterials for regeneration purposes. The aim of this case report was to examine the efficacy of ISBG in the management of buccal fenestration in the case of a 25-year-old female.

Case Report: After a traumatic tooth extraction, the defect was filled with ISBG and covered with a resorbable membrane. The ISBG showed easy handling and the patient had no complications during healing. Six months after augmentation, a bone biopsy was taken during implant bed preparation. The histological results showed good integration of ISBG into the newly formed bone and no signs of tissue inflammation. Additionally, a CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) analysis was performed to support the histological results.

Conclusion: The use of the examined ISBG led to successful treatment of the buccal fenestration defect.

Citing Articles

Guided Bone Regeneration Using Carbonated Apatite Granules and L-Lactic Acid/ε-Caprolactone Membranes: A Case Series and Histological Evaluation.

Taniguchi Y, Koyanagi T, Kitanaka Y, Yamada A, Aoki A, Iwata T Dent J (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39996959 PMC: 11854424. DOI: 10.3390/dj13020085.


Regeneration of Buccal Wall Defects after Tooth Extraction with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate in Injectable Form vs. Bovine Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

candrlic M, Tomas M, Matijevic M, Peric Kacarevic Z, Bicanic M, Udiljak Z Dent J (Basel). 2023; 11(9).

PMID: 37754343 PMC: 10528832. DOI: 10.3390/dj11090223.


Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans.

candrlic M, Tomas M, Karl M, Malesic L, Vcev A, Peric Kacarevic Z Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(5).

PMID: 35269686 PMC: 8910217. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052539.


Synthetic Injectable Biomaterials for Alveolar Bone Regeneration in Animal and Human Studies.

Tomas M, candrlic M, Juzbasic M, Ivanisevic Z, Matijevic N, Vcev A Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(11).

PMID: 34073551 PMC: 8197881. DOI: 10.3390/ma14112858.

References
1.
Araujo M, Lindhe J . Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32(2):212-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x. View

2.
Norton M, Gamble C . Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12(1):79-84. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001079.x. View

3.
Toure B, Faye B, Kane A, Lo C, Niang B, Boucher Y . Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth: a prospective study. J Endod. 2011; 37(11):1512-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.07.002. View

4.
Soldatos N, Stylianou P, Koidou V, Angelov N, Yukna R, Romanos G . Limitations and options using resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes for successful guided bone regeneration. Quintessence Int. 2016; 48(2):131-147. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a37133. View

5.
Laudenbach J, Simon Z . Common dental and periodontal diseases: evaluation and management. Med Clin North Am. 2014; 98(6):1239-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2014.08.002. View