» Articles » PMID: 33383030

Reliability and Validity of Clinical Tests for Measuring Strength or Endurance of Cervical Muscles: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2020 Dec 31
PMID 33383030
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of clinical tests for measuring cervical muscle strength or endurance in participants with and without neck pain.

Data Source: Systematic review and meta-analysis on reliability and validity. Literature search was conducted on January 28, 2020, using 5 databases: MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus.

Study Selection: We included studies that investigated the reliability or validity of clinical tests for measuring cervical muscle strength or endurance in participants with nonspecific chronic neck pain, with or without irradiation, or healthy participants. We included only those that were viable for daily practice and of low cost.

Data Extraction: Data were extracted as follows: (1) author and year of publication, (2) demographic values and health condition, (3) reported clinical tests, (4) inclusion and exclusion criteria, (5) description of test, (6) interrater reliability, and (7) intrarater reliability. For validity studies we also extracted the (8) reference method and (9) validity estimates.

Data Synthesis: Methodological quality was assessed with the Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability and the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies. Data on reliability and validity were extracted from included articles and then analyzed.

Results: Thirty-one studies were included. Cervical flexor and extensor endurance test, craniocervical flexion test (CCFT), AND cervical muscle strength using a handheld dynamometer (HHD) showed moderate to good intra- and interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.64-0.90). Concurrent validity was measured by only 2 studies, which do not provide adequate evidence for a recommendation.

Conclusions: The cervical flexor and extensor endurance tests, CCFT, and HHD for measuring cervical strength presented an acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability.

Citing Articles

Increase in Strength After Multimodal Pain Management Concept in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy-A Non-Randomized, Uncontrolled Clinical Trial.

Zirkl G, Schaumburger J, Gehentges M, Kaiser M Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768842 PMC: 11676987. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60121961.


Reliability of a Musculoskeletal Assessment for the Examination of Cervical Spine Pain and Injuries in Special Forces Combat Soldiers.

Sell T, Zerega R Sports (Basel). 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39330732 PMC: 11435987. DOI: 10.3390/sports12090255.


The association between mobile phone usage duration, neck muscle endurance, and neck pain among university students.

Elvan A, Cevik S, Vatansever K, Erak I Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):20116.

PMID: 39209955 PMC: 11362573. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-71153-4.


Between-Session Reliability of Field-Based Assessments of Isometric Neck Strength.

Oxford S, Clarke N, Tallis J Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(15).

PMID: 39124062 PMC: 11314792. DOI: 10.3390/s24155015.


The agreement of different techniques for muscle measurement in diagnosing sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li L, Xia Z, Zeng X, Tang A, Wang L, Su Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(3):2177-2192.

PMID: 38545058 PMC: 10963824. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1089.