Do People Have an Ethical Obligation to Share Their Health Information? Comparing Narratives of Altruism and Health Information Sharing in a Nationally Representative Sample

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2020 Dec 31

PMID 33382835

Citations 5

Authors

Minakshi Raj

Raymond De Vries

Paige Nong

Sharon L R Kardia

Jodyn E Platt

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: With the emergence of new health information technologies, health information can be shared across networks, with or without patients' awareness and/or their consent. It is often argued that there can be an ethical obligation to participate in biomedical research, motivated by altruism, particularly when risks are low. In this study, we explore whether altruism contributes to the belief that there is an ethical obligation to share information about one's health as well as how other health care experiences, perceptions, and concerns might be related to belief in such an obligation.

Methods: We conducted an online survey using the National Opinion Research Center's (NORC) probability-based, nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Our final analytic sample included complete responses from 2069 participants. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine how altruism, together with other knowledge, attitudes, and experiences contribute to the belief in an ethical obligation to allow health information to be used for research.

Results: We find in multivariable regression that general altruism is associated with a higher likelihood of belief in an ethical obligation to allow one's health information to be used for research (OR = 1.22, SE = 0.14, p = 0.078). Trust in the health system and in care providers are both associated with a significantly higher likelihood of believing there is an ethical obligation to allow health information to be used (OR = 1.48, SE = 0.76, p<0.001; OR = 1.58, SE = 0.26, p<0.01, respectively).

Conclusions: Belief that there is an ethical obligation to allow one's health information to be used for research is shaped by altruism and by one's experience with, and perceptions of, health care and by general concerns about the use of personal information. Altruism cannot be assumed and researchers must recognize the ways encounters with the health care system influence (un)willingness to share one's health information.

Citing Articles

Towards the outbreak tail, what is the public opinion about wastewater surveillance in the United States?.

Holm R, Anderson L, Ness H, LaJoie A, Smith T J Water Health. 2024; 22(8):1409-1418.

PMID: 39212278 DOI: 10.2166/wh.2024.074.

A qualitative study examining newly diagnosed breast cancer patients' experiences of participating in the Alberta Moving Beyond Breast Cancer (AMBER) prospective cohort study.

Corcoran L, Friedenreich C, McNeely M, Culos-Reed N, Bell G, Dickau L BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):500.

PMID: 37268901 PMC: 10235834. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10967-3.

Policy Preferences Regarding Health Data Sharing Among Patients With Cancer: Public Deliberations.

Raj M, Ryan K, Amara P, Nong P, Calhoun K, Trinidad M JMIR Cancer. 2023; 9:e39631.

PMID: 36719719 PMC: 9929721. DOI: 10.2196/39631.

Ethics challenges in sharing data from pragmatic clinical trials.

Morain S, Bollinger J, Weinfurt K, Sugarman J Clin Trials. 2022; 19(6):681-689.

PMID: 36071689 PMC: 10267884. DOI: 10.1177/17407745221110881.

Users' Willingness to Share Health Information in a Social Question-and-Answer Community: Cross-sectional Survey in China.

Li P, Xu L, Tang T, Wu X, Huang C JMIR Med Inform. 2021; 9(3):e26265.

PMID: 33783364 PMC: 8075348. DOI: 10.2196/26265.

References

Tait A, Voepel-Lewis T, Siewert M, Malviya S . Factors that influence parents' decisions to consent to their child's participation in clinical anesthesia research. Anesth Analg. 1998; 86(1):50-3. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199801000-00010. View

Aitken M, de St Jorre J, Pagliari C, Jepson R, Cunningham-Burley S . Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Med Ethics. 2016; 17(1):73. PMC: 5103425. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-016-0153-x. View

Wachbroit R, Wasserman D . Research participation: are we subject to a duty?. Am J Bioeth. 2005; 5(1):48-9. DOI: 10.1080/15265160590927831. View

Schaefer G, Emanuel E, Wertheimer A . The obligation to participate in biomedical research. JAMA. 2009; 302(1):67-72. PMC: 2763192. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.931. View

Freimuth V, Quinn S, Thomas S, Cole G, Zook E, Duncan T . African Americans' views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Soc Sci Med. 2001; 52(5):797-808. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00178-7. View

De Vries R, Tomlinson T, Kim H, Krenz C, Ryan K, Lehpamer N . The moral concerns of biobank donors: the effect of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate. Life Sci Soc Policy. 2016; 12:3. PMC: 4788662. DOI: 10.1186/s40504-016-0036-4. View

Evans H . Should patients be allowed to veto their participation in clinical research?. J Med Ethics. 2004; 30(2):198-203. PMC: 1733837. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.002444. View

Caplan A . Is there a duty to serve as a subject in biomedical research?. IRB. 1984; 6(5):1-5. View

Pellegrino E . Altruism, self-interest, and medical ethics. JAMA. 1987; 258(14):1939-40. View

10.

Madsen S, Holm S, Davidsen B, Munkholm P, Schlichting P, Riis P . Ethical aspects of clinical trials: the attitudes of participants in two non-cancer trials. J Intern Med. 2001; 248(6):463-74. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00755.x. View

11.

Mattis J, Hammond W, Grayman N, Bonacci M, Brennan W, Cowie S . The social production of altruism: motivations for caring action in a low-income urban community. Am J Community Psychol. 2009; 43(1-2):71-84. PMC: 3049186. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-008-9217-5. View

12.

Shavers V, Lynch C, Burmeister L . Knowledge of the Tuskegee study and its impact on the willingness to participate in medical research studies. J Natl Med Assoc. 2001; 92(12):563-72. PMC: 2568333. View

13.

Platt J, Kardia S . Public trust in health information sharing: implications for biobanking and electronic health record systems. J Pers Med. 2015; 5(1):3-21. PMC: 4384055. DOI: 10.3390/jpm5010003. View

14.

Blendon R, Benson J, Hero J . Public trust in physicians--U.S. medicine in international perspective. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(17):1570-2. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1407373. View

15.

Sterling R . Genetic research among the Havasupai--a cautionary tale. Virtual Mentor. 2012; 13(2):113-7. DOI: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2011.13.2.hlaw1-1102. View

16.

Kim S, Kim H, Ryan K, Appelbaum P, Knopman D, Damschroder L . How important is 'accuracy' of surrogate decision-making for research participation?. PLoS One. 2013; 8(1):e54790. PMC: 3561414. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054790. View

17.

Platt J, Jacobson P, Kardia S . Public Trust in Health Information Sharing: A Measure of System Trust. Health Serv Res. 2017; 53(2):824-845. PMC: 5867170. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12654. View

18.

Harris J . Scientific research is a moral duty. J Med Ethics. 2005; 31(4):242-8. PMC: 1734128. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.011973. View

19.

Herrera C . Universal compulsory service in medical research. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003; 24(3):215-31. DOI: 10.1023/a:1024888622358. View

20.

Williams D, Yu Y, Jackson J, Anderson N . Racial Differences in Physical and Mental Health: Socio-economic Status, Stress and Discrimination. J Health Psychol. 2011; 2(3):335-51. DOI: 10.1177/135910539700200305. View