» Articles » PMID: 33382767

Face Pareidolia in the Brain: Impact of Gender and Orientation

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Dec 31
PMID 33382767
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research on face sensitivity is of particular relevance during the rapidly evolving Covid-19 pandemic leading to social isolation, but also calling for intact interaction and sharing. Humans possess high sensitivity even to a coarse face scheme, seeing faces in non-face images where real faces do not exist. The advantage of non-face images is that single components do not trigger face processing. Here by implementing a novel set of Face-n-Thing images, we examined (i) how face tuning alters with changing display orientation, and (ii) whether it is affected by observers' gender. Young females and males were presented with a set of Face-n-Thing images either with canonical upright orientation or inverted 180° in the image plane. Face impression was substantially impeded by display inversion. Furthermore, whereas with upright display orientation, no gender differences were found, with inversion, Face-n-Thing images elicited face impression in females significantly more often. The outcome sheds light on the origins of the face inversion effect in general. Moreover, the findings open a way for examination of face sensitivity and underwriting brain networks in neuropsychiatric conditions related to the current pandemic (such as depression and anxiety), most of which are gender/sex-specific.

Citing Articles

I've just seen a face: further search for face pareidolia in chimpanzees ().

Tomonaga M Front Psychol. 2025; 15:1508867.

PMID: 39936109 PMC: 11810910. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1508867.


Perceptual constancy of pareidolias across paper and digital testing formats in neurodegenerative diseases.

Revankar G, Ozono T, Suzuki M, Kanemoto H, Furuya K, Shigenobu K Heliyon. 2024; 10(22):e40254.

PMID: 39584082 PMC: 11585718. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40254.


Face detection mechanisms: Nature nurture.

Kobylkov D, Vallortigara G Front Neurosci. 2024; 18():1404174.

PMID: 38812973 PMC: 11133589. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1404174.


Dynamic brain communication underwriting face pareidolia.

Romagnano V, Kubon J, Sokolov A, Fallgatter A, Braun C, Pavlova M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(16):e2401196121.

PMID: 38588422 PMC: 11032489. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2401196121.


Preliminary evidence of an increased susceptibility to face pareidolia in postpartum women.

Taubert J, Wally S, Dixson B Biol Lett. 2023; 19(9):20230126.

PMID: 37700700 PMC: 10498352. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0126.


References
1.
Turati C, Simion F, Milani I, Umilta C . Newborns' preference for faces: what is crucial?. Dev Psychol. 2002; 38(6):875-82. View

2.
Shah P, Happe F, Sowden S, Cook R, Bird G . Orienting Toward Face-Like Stimuli in Early Childhood. Child Dev. 2015; 86(6):1693-700. PMC: 4949536. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12441. View

3.
Akdeniz G, Gumusyayla S, Vural G, Bektas H, Deniz O . Changes in face and face pareidolia processing in patients with migraine: an ERP study. J Neurophysiol. 2020; 123(3):876-884. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00549.2019. View

4.
Pavlova M . Sex and gender affect the social brain: Beyond simplicity. J Neurosci Res. 2016; 95(1-2):235-250. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23871. View

5.
Liu T, Mu S, He H, Zhang L, Fan C, Ren J . The N170 component is sensitive to face-like stimuli: a study of Chinese Peking opera makeup. Cogn Neurodyn. 2016; 10(6):535-541. PMC: 5106454. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-016-9399-8. View