» Articles » PMID: 33381928

Robotic Pelvic Exenteration and Extended Pelvic Resections for Locally Advanced or Synchronous Rectal and Urological Malignancy

Overview
Specialty Urology
Date 2020 Dec 31
PMID 33381928
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To describe the surgical technique and examine the feasibility and outcomes following robotic pelvic exenteration and extended pelvic resection for rectal and/or urological malignancy.

Materials And Methods: We present a case series of seven patients with locally advanced or synchronous urological and/or rectal malignancy who underwent robotic total or posterior pelvic exenteration between 2012-2016.

Results: In total, we included seven patients undergoing pelvic exenteration or extended pelvic resection. The mean operative time was 485±157 minutes and median length of stay was 9 days (6-34 days). There was only one Clavien-Dindo complication grade 3 which was a vesicourethral anastomotic leak requiring rigid cystoscopy and bilateral ureteric catheter insertion. Eighty-five percent of patients had clear colorectal margins with a median margin of 3.5 mm (0.7-8.0 mm) while all urological margins were clear. Six out of seven patients had complete (grade 3) total mesorectal excision. Three patients experienced recurrence at a median of 22 months (21-24 months) post-operatively. Of the three recurrences, one was systemic only whilst two were both local and systemic. One patient died from complications of dual rectal and prostate cancer 31 months after the surgery.

Conclusions: We report a large series examining robotic pelvic exenteration or extended pelvic resection and describe the surgical technique involved. The robotic approach to pelvic exenteration is highly feasible and demonstrates acceptable peri-operative and oncological outcomes. It has the potential to benefit patients undergoing this highly complex and morbid procedure.

Citing Articles

Open versus robotic-assisted techniques for multivisceral pelvic resections of locally advanced or recurrent colorectal and anal cancers: short-term outcomes from a single centre.

Wyatt J, OConnell E, Choi M, Powell S, Hanchanale V, Ahmed S Tech Coloproctol. 2024; 28(1):161.

PMID: 39560793 PMC: 11576618. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03044-9.


Robotic versus open and laparoscopic pelvic exenterations for pelvic cancer: a multicenter propensity-matched analysis in Japan.

Yatabe Y, Hanaoka M, Hanazawa R, Hirakawa A, Mukai T, Kimura K Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(8):4390-4401.

PMID: 38886231 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10966-w.


Robotic beyond total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancers: Perioperative and oncological outcomes from a multicentre case series.

Khan J, Piozzi G, Rouanet P, Saklani A, Ozben V, Neary P Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024; 50(6):108308.

PMID: 38583214 PMC: 11702198. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108308.


Current status of robot-assisted total pelvic exenteration focusing on the field of urology: a clinical practice review.

Kamei J, Fujimura T Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(1):453-461.

PMID: 38410226 PMC: 10894324. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-1039.


Feasibility of robotic platform to perform R0 resection for locally advanced multi-visceral pelvic malignancy: an institutional experience on outcomes of robotic pelvic exenteration.

Saqib S, Raza M, Twigg J, Altan O, Bajwa A Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 409(1):9.

PMID: 38102305 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03206-7.


References
1.
Castillo O, Vidal-Mora I, Rodriguez-Carlin A, Silva A, Schatloff O . First Report: Robot-Assisted Total Pelvic Exenteration for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015; 25(7):592-4. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0213. View

2.
Winters B, Mann G, Louie O, Wright J . Robotic total pelvic exenteration with laparoscopic rectus flap: initial experience. Case Rep Surg. 2015; 2015:835425. PMC: 4415679. DOI: 10.1155/2015/835425. View

3.
Yaxley J, Coughlin G, Chambers S, Occhipinti S, Samaratunga H, Zajdlewicz L . Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet. 2016; 388(10049):1057-1066. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X. View

4.
. COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Dig Surg. 2001; 17(6):617-622. DOI: 10.1159/000051971. View

5.
Chen K, Cao G, Chen B, Wang M, Xu X, Cai W . Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of classic randomized controlled trials and high-quality Nonrandomized Studies in the last 5 years. Int J Surg. 2017; 39:1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.123. View