» Articles » PMID: 33377872

Learning Impact of a Virtual Brain Electrical Activity Simulator Among Neurophysiology Students: Mixed-Methods Intervention Study

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2020 Dec 30
PMID 33377872
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Virtual simulation is the re-creation of reality depicted on a computer screen. It offers the possibility to exercise motor and psychomotor skills. In biomedical and medical education, there is an attempt to find new ways to support students' learning in neurophysiology. Traditionally, recording electroencephalography (EEG) has been learned through practical hands-on exercises. To date, virtual simulations of EEG measurements have not been used.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the development of students' theoretical knowledge and practical skills in the EEG measurement when using a virtual EEG simulator in biomedical laboratory science in the context of a neurophysiology course.

Methods: A computer-based EEG simulator was created. The simulator allowed virtual electrode placement and EEG graph interpretation. The usefulness of the simulator for learning EEG measurement was tested with 35 participants randomly divided into three equal groups. Group 1 (experimental group 1) used the simulator with fuzzy feedback, group 2 (experimental group 2) used the simulator with exact feedback, and group 3 (control group) did not use a simulator. The study comprised pre- and posttests on theoretical knowledge and practical hands-on evaluation of EEG electrode placement.

Results: The Wilcoxon signed-rank test indicated that the two groups that utilized a computer-based electrode placement simulator showed significant improvement in both theoretical knowledge (Z=1.79, P=.074) and observed practical skills compared with the group that studied without a simulator.

Conclusions: Learning electrode placement using a simulator enhances students' ability to place electrodes and, in combination with practical hands-on training, increases their understanding of EEG measurement.

Citing Articles

The status of virtual simulation experiments in medical education in China: based on the national virtual simulation experiment teaching Center (iLAB-X).

Zhu H, Xu J, Wang P, Liu H, Chen T, Zhao Z Med Educ Online. 2023; 28(1):2272387.

PMID: 37883485 PMC: 10984652. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2272387.


Virtual Simulation in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review of Recent Practice.

Wu Q, Wang Y, Lu L, Chen Y, Long H, Wang J Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:855403.

PMID: 35433717 PMC: 9006810. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.855403.

References
1.
Al-Elq A . Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. J Family Community Med. 2011; 17(1):35-40. PMC: 3195067. DOI: 10.4103/1319-1683.68787. View

2.
Kemp B, Zwinderman A, Tuk B, Kamphuisen H, Oberye J . Analysis of a sleep-dependent neuronal feedback loop: the slow-wave microcontinuity of the EEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000; 47(9):1185-94. DOI: 10.1109/10.867928. View

3.
Olejniczak P . Neurophysiologic basis of EEG. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006; 23(3):186-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.wnp.0000220079.61973.6c. View

4.
Acharya J, Hani A, Cheek J, Thirumala P, Tsuchida T . American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 2: Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016; 33(4):308-11. DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000316. View

5.
Baranowski T, Baranowski J, Thompson D, Buday R, Jago R, Griffith M . Video game play, child diet, and physical activity behavior change a randomized clinical trial. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 40(1):33-8. PMC: 3032382. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.029. View