» Articles » PMID: 33377466

Alveolar Cleft Bone Grafting: Factors Affecting Case Prognosis

Overview
Date 2020 Dec 30
PMID 33377466
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this retrospective study was to determine the significance and impact of several factors on the alveolar cleft bone grafting procedure.

Materials And Methods: The medical records were reviewed. In addition, x-rays were checked. The size of every cleft was measured in this retrospective study. The analyzed factors included sex, age, type of cleft, size of the cleft, and the type of flap used in surgery. The patients were characterized into group A (no complications, Bergland scale 1 or 2), group B (complications or Bergland scale 3), or group C (failure cases). Statistical analysis was performed with a -value set at 0.05.

Results: There were 32 cases in group A, 26 in group B, and 9 in group C. Multinomial logistic regression showed an association between the type of the cleft and the size of the cleft, with the presence of complications, or achieving type 3 on the Bergland scale, with odds ratios of 5.118 and 6.000, respectively. The type of cleft was related to failure with an odds ratio of 4.833. Given a small sample, statistical analysis could not be performed to evaluate the relationship between the size of the cleft and group C. Age, sex, and the type of the flap were not significant factors.

Conclusion: The cleft size of more than 10 mm and bilateral clefts were listed regarding their effect on the procedure. Clinicians should not overlook these factors. In addition, patients must be informed of any risks that are present.

Citing Articles

A Review of Orthodontic Considerations before and after Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.

Cabrera C Acta Med Philipp. 2025; 58(21):7-19.

PMID: 39758297 PMC: 11694040. DOI: 10.47895/amp.vi0.6985.


Outcomes of Xenograft with Platelet-rich Fibrin versus Autogenous Bone in Alveolar Cleft Grafting.

Bedeer H, Asklany A, Ali W, Elyounsi M, Mohammed M, Youssef M Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(9):e6106.

PMID: 39351181 PMC: 11441918. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006106.


Early Results on the Efficacy of Demineralized Bone Matrix, Bone Morphogenic Protein, and Freeze-dried Bone Chips in Alveolar Cleft Repair.

Marquez J, Sudduth J, DeMay H, Kuo K, Battistini A, Yamashiro D Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(2):e5600.

PMID: 38322815 PMC: 10846763. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005600.


Polymethylmethacrylate-hydroxyapatite antibacterial and antifungal activity against oral bacteria: An in vitro study.

Saskianti T, Wardhani K, Fadhila N, Wahluyo S, Dewi A, Nugraha A J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2024; 19(1):190-197.

PMID: 38229827 PMC: 10790095. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.11.001.


Consequence of Synthetic Bone Substitute Used for Alveolar Cleft Graft Reconstruction (Preliminary Clinical Study).

Al-Rawee R, Tawfeeq B, Hamodat A, Tawfek Z Arch Plast Surg. 2023; 50(5):478-487.

PMID: 37808326 PMC: 10556338. DOI: 10.1055/a-2113-3084.


References
1.
von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B . The TIME technique: a new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11(3):387-94. View

2.
Lim H, Kim J, Lee U, Kim J, Lee H . Risk Factor Analysis of Graft Failure With Concomitant Cyst Enucleation of the Jaw Bone: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 75(8):1668-1678. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.003. View

3.
Shirzadeh A, Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S . A Prospective Study of Chin Bone Graft Harvesting for Unilateral Maxillary Alveolar Cleft During Mixed Dentition. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 76(1):180-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.07.143. View

4.
Chen G, Sun M, Yin N, Li H . A Novel Method to Calculate the Volume of Alveolar Cleft Defect Before Surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2017; 29(2):342-346. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004181. View

5.
BERGLAND O, Semb G, Abyholm F . Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J. 1986; 23(3):175-205. View