» Articles » PMID: 33374176

Clinical Performance and Future Potential of Magnetic Resonance Thermometry in Hyperthermia

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Dec 30
PMID 33374176
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hyperthermia treatments in the clinic rely on accurate temperature measurements to guide treatments and evaluate clinical outcome. Currently, magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) is the only clinical option to non-invasively measure 3D temperature distributions. In this review, we evaluate the status quo and emerging approaches in this evolving technology for replacing conventional dosimetry based on intraluminal or invasively placed probes. First, we define standardized MRT performance thresholds, aiming at facilitating transparency in this field when comparing MR temperature mapping performance for the various scenarios that hyperthermia is currently applied in the clinic. This is based upon our clinical experience of treating nearly 4000 patients with superficial and deep hyperthermia. Second, we perform a systematic literature review, assessing MRT performance in (I) clinical and (II) pre-clinical papers. From (I) we identify the current clinical status of MRT, including the problems faced and from (II) we extract promising new techniques with the potential to accelerate progress. From (I) we found that the basic requirements for MRT during hyperthermia in the clinic are largely met for regions without motion, for example extremities. In more challenging regions (abdomen and thorax), progress has been stagnating after the clinical introduction of MRT-guided hyperthermia over 20 years ago. One clear difficulty for advancement is that performance is not or not uniformly reported, but also that studies often omit important details regarding their approach. Motion was found to be the common main issue hindering accurate MRT. Based on (II), we reported and highlighted promising developments to tackle the issues resulting from motion (directly or indirectly), including new developments as well as optimization of already existing strategies. Combined, these may have the potential to facilitate improvement in MRT in the form of more stable and reliable measurements via better stability and accuracy.

Citing Articles

Image-Based Monitoring of Thermal Ablation.

Wang X, Zhao S, Zhang A Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39851352 PMC: 11762831. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010078.


EPI proton resonant frequency temperature mapping at 0.5T in the brain: Comparison to single-echo gradient recalled echo.

Martinez D, Wiens C, Harris C, Handler W, Chronik B Magn Reson Med. 2024; 93(4):1733-1740.

PMID: 39529375 PMC: 11782719. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30373.


Helmet Radio Frequency Phased Array Applicators Enhance Thermal Magnetic Resonance of Brain Tumors.

Rahimi F, Nurzed B, Eigentler T, Berangi M, Oberacker E, Kuehne A Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39061815 PMC: 11273942. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11070733.


Titanium Culture Vessel Presenting Temperature Gradation for the Thermotolerance Estimation of Cells.

Imashiro C, Jin Y, Hayama M, Yamada T, Funahashi A, Sakaguchi K Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2023; 4:0049.

PMID: 37554432 PMC: 10405790. DOI: 10.34133/cbsystems.0049.


Electrospun Magnetic Nanofiber Mats for Magnetic Hyperthermia in Cancer Treatment Applications-Technology, Mechanism, and Materials.

Mamun A, Sabantina L Polymers (Basel). 2023; 15(8).

PMID: 37112049 PMC: 10143376. DOI: 10.3390/polym15081902.


References
1.
Craciunescu O, Stauffer P, Soher B, Wyatt C, Arabe O, Maccarini P . Accuracy of real time noninvasive temperature measurements using magnetic resonance thermal imaging in patients treated for high grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Med Phys. 2009; 36(11):4848-58. PMC: 2773239. DOI: 10.1118/1.3227506. View

2.
Gellermann J, Wlodarczyk W, Hildebrandt B, Ganter H, Nicolau A, Rau B . Noninvasive magnetic resonance thermography of recurrent rectal carcinoma in a 1.5 Tesla hybrid system. Cancer Res. 2005; 65(13):5872-80. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3952. View

3.
van der Zee J, Rietveld P, van Rhoon G . Practical limitations of interstitial thermometry during deep hyperthermia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998; 40(5):1205-12. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00008-x. View

4.
Mei C, Chu R, Hoge W, Panych L, Madore B . Accurate field mapping in the presence of B0 inhomogeneities, applied to MR thermometry. Magn Reson Med. 2014; 73(6):2142-51. PMC: 4277742. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25338. View

5.
Winter L, Oberacker E, Paul K, Ji Y, Oezerdem C, Ghadjar P . Magnetic resonance thermometry: Methodology, pitfalls and practical solutions. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015; 32(1):63-75. DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1108462. View