» Articles » PMID: 33371926

Effects of Decision Aids for Depression Treatment in Adults: Systematic Review

Abstract

Aim And Method: To determine the effect on decisional-related and clinical outcomes of decision aids for depression treatment in adults in randomised clinical trials. In January 2019, a systematic search was conducted in five databases. Study selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Meta-analyses were performed, and standardised and weighted mean differences were calculated, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated with GRADE methodology.

Results: Six randomised clinical trials were included. The pooled estimates showed that decision aids for depression treatment had a beneficial effect on patients' decisional conflict, patient knowledge and information exchange between patient and health professional. However, no statistically significant effect was found for doctor facilitation, treatment adherence or depressive symptoms. The certainty of the evidence was very low for all outcomes.

Clinical Implications: Using decision aids to choose treatment in patients with depression may have a a beneficial effect on decisional-related outcomes, but it may not translate into an improvement in clinical outcomes.

Citing Articles

An online evidence-based dictionary of common adverse events of antidepressants: a new tool to empower patients and clinicians in their shared decision-making process.

Hong J, Ostinelli E, Kamvar R, Smith K, Walsh A, Kabir T BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):532.

PMID: 39049079 PMC: 11270875. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05950-6.


Comparison of analog and digital patient decision aids for the treatment of depression: a scoping review.

Sedlakova J, Westermair A, Biller-Andorno N, Meier C, Trachsel M Front Digit Health. 2023; 5:1208889.

PMID: 37744684 PMC: 10513051. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1208889.


Psychometric evaluation of a decision quality instrument for medication decisions for treatment of depression symptoms.

Brodney S, Valentine K, Sepucha K BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021; 21(1):252.

PMID: 34445969 PMC: 8394109. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01611-w.

References
1.
Loh A, Simon D, Wills C, Kriston L, Niebling W, Harter M . The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 67(3):324-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.023. View

2.
Elwyn G, OConnor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A . Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006; 333(7565):417. PMC: 1553508. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. View

3.
Wieringa T, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Spencer-Bonilla G, de Wit M, Ponce O, Sanchez-Herrera M . Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2019; 8(1):121. PMC: 6528254. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1034-4. View

4.
Lenz M, Buhse S, Kasper J, Kupfer R, Richter T, Muhlhauser I . Decision aids for patients. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012; 109(22-23):401-8. PMC: 3389744. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0401. View

5.
Perestelo-Perez L, Rivero-Santana A, Sanchez-Afonso J, Perez-Ramos J, Castellano-Fuentes C, Sepucha K . Effectiveness of a decision aid for patients with depression: A randomized controlled trial. Health Expect. 2017; 20(5):1096-1105. PMC: 5600223. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12553. View