» Articles » PMID: 33371309

Understanding South Korea's Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Real-Time Analysis

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Dec 29
PMID 33371309
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This case study focuses on the epidemiological situation of the COVID-19 outbreak, its impacts and the measures South Korea undertook during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the first case was confirmed on 20 January 2020, South Korea has been actively experiencing the COVID-19 outbreak. In the early stage of the pandemic, South Korea was one of the most-affected countries because of a large outbreak related to meetings of a religious movement, namely the Shincheonji Church of Jesus, in a city called Daegu and North Gyeongsang province. However, South Korea was held as a model for many other countries as it appeared to slow the spread of the outbreak with distinctive approaches and interventions. First of all, with drastic and early intervention strategies it conducted massive tracing and testing in a combination of case isolation. These measures were underpinned by transparent risk communication, civil society mobilization, improvement of accessibility and affordability of the treatment and test, the consistent public message on the potential benefit of wearing a mask, and innovation. Innovative measures include the mobile case-tracing application, mobile self-quarantine safety protection application, mobile self-diagnosis application, and drive-thru screening centres. Meanwhile, the epidemic has brought enormous impacts on society economically and socially. Given its relationship with China, where the outbreak originated, the economic impact in South Korea was predicted to be intense and it was already observed since February due to a decline in exports. The pandemic and measures undertaken by the government also have resulted in social conflicts and debates, human-right concerns, and political tension. Moreover, it was believed that the outbreak of COVID-19 and the governmental responses towards it has brought a huge impact on the general election in April. Despite of the large outbreak in late February, the Korean government has flattened the COVID-19 curve successfully and the downward trend in the number of new cases remained continuously as of 30 April. The most distinctive feature of South Korea's responses is that South Korea conducted proactive case finding, contacts tracing, and isolations of cases instead of taking traditional measures of the containment of the epidemic such as boarder closures and lockdowns.

Citing Articles

Impact of in-hospital COVID-19 quarantine policy changes on quality of acute stroke care: a single center experience.

Kim M, Lee K, Kim S, Kim H, Han J, Kim H Front Neurol. 2025; 15():1488529.

PMID: 39839862 PMC: 11746089. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1488529.


Analyzing the dynamics of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Seoul, Korea: a multifaceted time series approach.

Baek K, Park C Epidemiol Health. 2024; 46:e2024081.

PMID: 39363604 PMC: 11832239. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2024081.


New framework to assess tracing and testing based on South Korea's response to COVID-19.

Kim J, Jo S, Cho S BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):469.

PMID: 38702610 PMC: 11067276. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09363-4.


Government Initiatives for Research Ethics During COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea.

Park Y, Kim O J Korean Med Sci. 2024; 39(12):e116.

PMID: 38565174 PMC: 10985498. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e116.


Cadmium toxicity and autophagy: a review.

Shao Y, Zheng L, Jiang Y Biometals. 2024; 37(3):609-629.

PMID: 38277035 DOI: 10.1007/s10534-023-00581-y.


References
1.
Perra N, Balcan D, Goncalves B, Vespignani A . Towards a characterization of behavior-disease models. PLoS One. 2011; 6(8):e23084. PMC: 3149628. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023084. View

2.
Choi S, Ki M . Estimating the reproductive number and the outbreak size of COVID-19 in Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2020; 42:e2020011. PMC: 7285447. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2020011. View

3.
Kim S, Seo Y, Jung E . Prediction of COVID-19 transmission dynamics using a mathematical model considering behavior changes in Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2020; 42:e2020026. PMC: 7285444. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2020026. View

4.
Heffernan J, Smith R, Wahl L . Perspectives on the basic reproductive ratio. J R Soc Interface. 2006; 2(4):281-93. PMC: 1578275. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2005.0042. View

5.
Park S, Choi G, Ko H . Information Technology-Based Tracing Strategy in Response to COVID-19 in South Korea-Privacy Controversies. JAMA. 2020; 323(21):2129-2130. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.6602. View