» Articles » PMID: 33367804

E-cigarette Use in Prisons With Recently Established Smokefree Policies: A Qualitative Interview Study With People in Custody in Scotland

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Dec 28
PMID 33367804
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: E-cigarettes were one measure introduced to help people in custody (PiC) to prepare for and cope with implementation of comprehensive smokefree policies in Scottish prisons. Our earlier study explored experiences of vaping when e-cigarettes were first introduced and most participants were dual tobacco and e-cigarette users. Here we present findings of a subsequent study of vaping among a different sample of PiC when use of tobacco was prohibited in prison, and smokefree policy had become the norm.

Methods: Twenty-eight qualitative interviews were conducted with PiC who were current or former users of e-cigarettes in prison, 6-10 months after implementation of a smokefree policy. Data were managed and analyzed using the framework approach.

Results: PiC reported that vaping helped with mandated smoking abstinence. However, findings suggest that some PiC may be susceptible to heavy e-cigarette use potentially as a consequence of high nicotine dependence and situational factors such as e-cigarette product choice and availability in prisons; issues with nicotine delivery; prison regimes; and use of e-cigarettes for managing negative emotions. These factors may act as barriers to cutting down or stopping use of e-cigarettes by PiC who want to make changes due to dissatisfaction with vaping or lack of interest in continued use of nicotine, cost, and/or health concerns.

Conclusions: E-cigarettes helped PiC to cope with smokefree rules, although concerns about e-cigarette efficacy, cost, and safety were raised. PiC may desire or benefit both from conventional smoking cessation programs and from interventions to support reduction, or cessation, of vaping.

Implications: Findings highlight successes, challenges, and potential solutions in respect of use of e-cigarettes to cope with mandated smoking abstinence in populations with high smoking prevalence and heavy nicotine dependence. Experiences from prisons in Scotland may be of particular interest to health and/or justice services in other jurisdictions, with similar legislation on e-cigarettes to the United Kingdom, who are planning for institutional smokefree policies in their prisons or inpatient mental health settings in the future.

Citing Articles

Recent evidence on rates and factors influencing smoking behaviours after release from smoke-free prisons: a scoping review.

Brown A, Woods-Brown C, Angus K, McMeekin N, Hunt K, Demou E Int J Prison Health (2024). 2024; ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):450-465.

PMID: 39410826 PMC: 11616588. DOI: 10.1108/IJOPH-10-2023-0064.


Implementation of a national smoke-free prison policy: an economic evaluation within the Tobacco in Prisons (TIPs) study.

McMeekin N, Wu O, Boyd K, Brown A, Tweed E, Best C Tob Control. 2022; 32(6):701-708.

PMID: 35256533 PMC: 7615232. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056991.


Purchasing of tobacco-related and e-cigarette-related products within prisons before and after implementation of smoke-free prison policy: analysis of prisoner spend data across Scotland, UK.

Best C, Brown A, Hunt K BMJ Open. 2022; 12(2):e058909.

PMID: 35193923 PMC: 8867351. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058909.


Challenges associated with e-cigarette use by people in custody in Scottish prisons: a qualitative interview study with prison staff.

ODonnell R, Brown A, Eadie D, Mitchell D, Bauld L, Demou E BMJ Open. 2022; 12(2):e051009.

PMID: 35190418 PMC: 8860047. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051009.


Post-implementation perspectives on smokefree prison policy: a qualitative study with staff and people in custody.

Brown A, Mitchell D, Hunt K Eur J Public Health. 2021; 32(1):112-118.

PMID: 34448834 PMC: 8807073. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab075.

References
1.
Simonavicius E, McNeill A, Arnott D, Brose L . What factors are associated with current smokers using or stopping e-cigarette use?. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017; 173:139-143. PMC: 5380653. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.002. View

2.
Richmond R, Butler T, Wilhelm K, Wodak A, Cunningham M, Anderson I . Tobacco in prisons: a focus group study. Tob Control. 2009; 18(3):176-82. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2008.026393. View

3.
Makris E, Gourgoulianis K, Hatzoglou C . Prisoners and cigarettes or 'imprisoned in cigarettes'? What helps prisoners quit smoking?. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:508. PMC: 3433336. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-508. View

4.
Brown A, ODonnell R, Eadie D, Purves R, Sweeting H, Ford A . Initial Views and Experiences of Vaping in Prisons: A Qualitative Study With People in Custody Preparing for the Imminent Implementation of Scotland's Prison Smokefree Policy. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; 23(3):543-549. PMC: 7885768. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa088. View

5.
Sweeting H, Demou E, Brown A, Hunt K . Prisoners and prison staff express increased support for prison smoking bans following implementation across Scotland: results from the Tobacco In Prisons study. Tob Control. 2020; 30(5):597-598. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055683. View