» Articles » PMID: 33367241

Uncertainty of EIN2 Inactivation by CTR1-Mediated Phosphorylation Reveals the Complexity of Ethylene Signaling

Overview
Journal Plant Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Dec 28
PMID 33367241
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE2 (EIN2) is a key component of ethylene signaling whose activity is inhibited upon phosphorylation of Ser and Ser by the Raf-like CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE-RESPONSE 1 (CTR1) in the absence of ethylene. Ethylene prevents CTR1 activity and thus EIN2 phosphorylation, and subcellular trafficking of a proteolytically cleaved EIN2 C terminus (EIN2-C) from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus and processing bodies triggers ethylene signaling. Here, we report an unexpected complexity of EIN2-activated ethylene signaling. EIN2 activation in part requires ethylene in the absence of CTR1-mediated negative regulation. The mutant was complemented by the transgenes encoding EIN2, EIN2 variants with mutations that either prevent or mimic Ser/Ser phosphorylation, or EIN2-C; and all the transgenic lines carrying these EIN2-derived transgenes responded to ethylene. Furthermore, we found that the fluorescence protein-tagged EIN2 and its variants were affected little by ethylene and exhibited similar subcellular distribution patterns: in the cytosolic particles and nuclear speckles. Of note, the subcellular localization patterns of EIN2 proteins fused with a fluorescence protein either at the N or C terminus were similar, whereas EIN2-C-YFP was primarily observed in the cytosol but not in the nucleus. Western blots and mass spectrum analyses suggested a high complexity of EIN2, which is likely proteolytically processed into multiple fragments. Our results suggested a nuclear localization of the full-length EIN2, weak association of the EIN2 phosphorylation status and ethylene signaling, and the complexity of ethylene signaling caused by EIN2 and its proteolytic products in different subcellular compartments. We propose an alternative model to explain EIN2-activated ethylene signaling.

Citing Articles

Phosphoproteomic analysis of distylous Turnera subulata identifies pathways related to endoreduplication that correlate with reciprocal herkogamy.

Henning P, Minkoff B, Sussman M Am J Bot. 2024; 111(12):e16438.

PMID: 39551943 PMC: 11659920. DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.16438.


CELLULOSE SYNTHASE-LIKE C proteins modulate cell wall establishment during ethylene-mediated root growth inhibition in rice.

Zhou Y, Gao Y, Zhang B, Yang H, Tian Y, Huang Y Plant Cell. 2024; 36(9):3751-3769.

PMID: 38943676 PMC: 11371184. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koae195.


A chromosome-level genome assembly of , a tomato wild relative associated with resistance to salinity and drought.

Molitor C, Kurowski T, Fidalgo de Almeida P, Kevei Z, Spindlow D, Chacko Kaitholil S Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1342739.

PMID: 38525148 PMC: 10957597. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1342739.


Importin β1 Mediates Nuclear Entry of EIN2C to Confer the Phloem-Based Defense against Aphids.

Lu K, Zhang L, Qin L, Chen X, Wang X, Zhang M Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(10).

PMID: 37239892 PMC: 10217940. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24108545.


Ethylene-triggered subcellular trafficking of CTR1 enhances the response to ethylene gas.

Park H, Seo D, Lee H, Bakshi A, Park C, Chien Y Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):365.

PMID: 36690618 PMC: 9870993. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-35975-6.


References
1.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

2.
Zhang F, Wang L, Ko E, Shao K, Qiao H . Histone Deacetylases SRT1 and SRT2 Interact with ENAP1 to Mediate Ethylene-Induced Transcriptional Repression. Plant Cell. 2018; 30(1):153-166. PMC: 5810571. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.17.00671. View

3.
McDaniel B, Binder B . ethylene receptor 1 (etr1) Is Sufficient and Has the Predominant Role in Mediating Inhibition of Ethylene Responses by Silver in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287(31):26094-103. PMC: 3406693. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.383034. View

4.
Bisson M, Groth G . Targeting Plant Ethylene Responses by Controlling Essential Protein-Protein Interactions in the Ethylene Pathway. Mol Plant. 2015; 8(8):1165-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.03.014. View

5.
Vaux D . Research methods: Know when your numbers are significant. Nature. 2012; 492(7428):180-1. DOI: 10.1038/492180a. View