» Articles » PMID: 33366444

Fidelity of DNA Polymerases in the Detection of Intraindividual Variation of Mitochondrial DNA

Overview
Date 2020 Dec 28
PMID 33366444
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Here we investigated the consequences of PCR amplification errors in the identification of intraindividual mtDNA variation. The bumblebee was chosen as model for the gene amplification tests with two DNA polymerases ( and Q5) presenting different error rates. The amplifications using resulted in a significant increase of singleton haplotypes per individual in comparison to Q5. The sequence characteristics indicated that resulted haplotypes are mostly due to amplification errors. Studies focusing on intraindividual variability should address special attention to the DNA polymerase fidelity to avoid overestimation of heteroplasmic haplotypes.

Citing Articles

Amplified DNA heterogeneity assessment with Oxford Nanopore sequencing applied to cell free expression templates.

Hejazi S, Ahsan A, Kashani S, Tameiv D, Reuel N PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0305457.

PMID: 39625927 PMC: 11614277. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305457.


Amplified DNA Heterogeneity Assessment with Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Applied to Cell Free Expression Templates.

Hejazi S, Ahsan A, Kashani M, Reuel N bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38895213 PMC: 11185537. DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.02.597048.


Engineered helicase replaces thermocycler in DNA amplification while retaining desired PCR characteristics.

Gavrilov M, Yang J, Zou R, Ma W, Lee C, Mohapatra S Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):6312.

PMID: 36274095 PMC: 9588791. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34076-0.


Unparalleled mitochondrial heteroplasmy and co-infection in the non-model bee, .

Davies O, Dorey J, Stevens M, Gardner M, Bradford T, Schwarz M Curr Res Insect Sci. 2022; 2:100036.

PMID: 36003268 PMC: 9387454. DOI: 10.1016/j.cris.2022.100036.


Analyzing Low-Level mtDNA Heteroplasmy-Pitfalls and Challenges from Bench to Benchmarking.

Fazzini F, Fendt L, Schonherr S, Forer L, Schopf B, Streiter G Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(2).

PMID: 33477827 PMC: 7832847. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020935.


References
1.
McInerney P, Adams P, Hadi M . Error Rate Comparison during Polymerase Chain Reaction by DNA Polymerase. Mol Biol Int. 2014; 2014:287430. PMC: 4150459. DOI: 10.1155/2014/287430. View

2.
Smith J, Modrich P . Removal of polymerase-produced mutant sequences from PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(13):6847-50. PMC: 21247. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6847. View

3.
Keohavong P, Thilly W . Fidelity of DNA polymerases in DNA amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989; 86(23):9253-7. PMC: 298472. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.23.9253. View

4.
Yamagami T, Ishino S, Kawarabayasi Y, Ishino Y . Mutant Taq DNA polymerases with improved elongation ability as a useful reagent for genetic engineering. Front Microbiol. 2014; 5:461. PMC: 4153296. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00461. View

5.
Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S . Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(12):1647-9. PMC: 3371832. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. View