» Articles » PMID: 33363655

A NEW SIMPLE, PERSONALIZED, AND QUANTITATIVE EMPIRICAL METHOD FOR DETERMINING I ACTIVITY IN TREATING GRAVES' DISEASE

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2020 Dec 28
PMID 33363655
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: The I activity for treating Graves' disease (GD) is usually determined based on physician's experience.

Objective: This study aimed to design an empirical method that was not only personalized and quantitative, but also simple, convenient, and easy to grasp.

Subjects And Methods: The study population comprised patients with GD, selected between May 2013 and May 2016, who received I therapy in the Outpatient Department of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital. The first-visit patients of physician 1 were placed in the traditional group: the activity of I (mCi) was calculated using the routine formula: [empirical activity (0.07-0.12 mCi/g) × thyroid mass]/[24-h thyroid I uptake]. The first-visit patients of physician 2 were placed in the personalized group. The activity of I (mCi) was calculated in two steps. First, the initial activity was calculated: 0.1 mCi/g × thyroid mass (g), and then a personalized and quantitative calibration table of I activity was used to obtain a final I activity. The cure rate with a single activity of I was recorded 1 year later.

Results: The traditional and personalized groups included 241 and 282 patients, respectively. Interestingly, the personalized group achieved a higher cure rate [86.5% (244/282) 73.4% (177/241), P = 0.000] with a relatively higher I activity for the first treatment [8.7 (7, 3.5-30) mCi 6.7(6, 2.5-30) mCi, P = 0.000] compared with the traditional group, while the incidence rate of permanent hypothyroidism was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.175).

Conclusion: The empirical method designed in this study was reliable.

Citing Articles

Ultrasound combined with Ki-67 to construct the prognostic model for radioactive iodine therapy outcomes in Graves' disease patients.

Wang Y, Hong L, Yang C, Lv G, Wang K, Huang X Endocr Connect. 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 38108761 PMC: 10831585. DOI: 10.1530/EC-23-0429.

References
1.
Iagaru A, McDougall I . Treatment of thyrotoxicosis. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(3):379-89. View

2.
Kalinyak J, McDougall I . How should the dose of iodine-131 be determined in the treatment of Graves' hyperthyroidism?. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 88(3):975-7. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2002-021801. View

3.
Hyer S, Pratt B, Gray M, Chittenden S, Du Y, Harmer C . Dosimetry-based treatment for Graves' disease. Nucl Med Commun. 2018; 39(6):486-492. PMC: 5965923. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000826. View

4.
Zantut-Wittmann D, Ramos C, Santos A, Lima M, Panzan A, Facuri F . High pre-therapy [99mTc]pertechnetate thyroid uptake, thyroid size and thyrostatic drugs: predictive factors of failure in [131I]iodide therapy in Graves' disease. Nucl Med Commun. 2005; 26(11):957-63. DOI: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000183795.59097.42. View

5.
Donovan P, McLeod D, Little R, Gordon L . Cost-utility analysis comparing radioactive iodine, anti-thyroid drugs and total thyroidectomy for primary treatment of Graves' disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016; 175(6):595-603. DOI: 10.1530/EJE-16-0527. View