» Articles » PMID: 33361234

Contraceptive Method Mix: Updates and Implications

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Dec 28
PMID 33361234
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Improving contraceptive method choice is a goal of international family planning. Method mix-the percentage distribution of total contraceptive use across various methods-reflects both supply (availability of affordable methods) and demand (client preferences). We analyze changes in method mix, regional contrasts, and the relationship of the mix to contraceptive prevalence.

Methods: We use 789 national surveys from the 1960s through 2019, from 113 developing countries with at least 1 million people and with data on use of 8 contraceptive methods. Two measures assess the "evenness" of the mix: method skew (more than 50% use is by 1 method), and the average deviation (AD) of the 8 methods' shares from their mean value. Population weighted and unweighted results are compared because they can differ substantially.

Results: Use of traditional methods has declined but still represents 11% of all use (population weighted) or 17% (unweighted country average). Vasectomy's share was historically low with the exception of a few countries but is now even lower. The previous trend toward greater overall evenness in the mix has slowed recently. Sub-Saharan Africa shows a hormonal method progression from oral contraceptives to injectables to implants in a substantial number of countries. In some countries with high HIV prevalence, the condom share has increased. The leading method's share differs by region: female sterilization in Asia (39%) and in Latin America (31%), the pill in the Middle East/North Africa (32%), and the injectable in sub-Saharan Africa (36%). Method skew persists in 30% of countries. "Evenness" of mix is not related to contraceptive prevalence.

Conclusion: The marked diversity in predominant methods underscores the conclusion that no single method mix is ideal or appropriate everywhere. But that diversity across countries, coupled with the persisting high degree of extreme skewness in many of them, argues for continued concerted efforts for programs to increase method choice.

Citing Articles

Contraceptive Care Visit Objectives and Outcomes: Evidence From Burkina Faso, Pakistan, and Tanzania.

Moucheraud C, Wollum A, Brooks M, Shah M, Gipson J, Wagner Z Stud Fam Plann. 2024; 55(4):315-332.

PMID: 39627833 PMC: 11636775. DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12279.


Mobilizing stakeholders for implant removals in Burkina Faso using landscape assessment data.

Tiendrebeogo J, Arnold B, Ouedraogo Y, Haws R, Garane L, Ouedraogo V BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):301.

PMID: 38769558 PMC: 11104007. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03121-z.


Access to quality contraceptive counselling among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa.

Mohammed A, Donkoh I, Aboagye R, Ahinkorah B, Seidu A Contracept Reprod Med. 2024; 9(1):16.

PMID: 38622719 PMC: 11017582. DOI: 10.1186/s40834-024-00267-x.


[Contraceptive mix and factors associated with the type of method used by Brazilian women: a population-based cross-sectional study].

Araujo F, Abreu M, Felisbino-Mendes M Cad Saude Publica. 2023; 39(8):e00229322.

PMID: 37820236 PMC: 10566557. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XPT229322.


Understanding ethical challenges of family planning interventions in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.

Montt-Maray E, Adamjee L, Horanieh N, Witt A, Gonzalez-Capella T, Zinke-Allmang A Front Glob Womens Health. 2023; 4:1149632.

PMID: 37674903 PMC: 10478786. DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1149632.


References
1.
Sutherland E, Otterness C, Janowitz B . What happens to contraceptive use after injectables are introduced? An analysis of 13 countries. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 37(4):202-8. DOI: 10.1363/3720211. View

2.
Dev R, Kohler P, Feder M, Unger J, Woods N, Drake A . A systematic review and meta-analysis of postpartum contraceptive use among women in low- and middle-income countries. Reprod Health. 2019; 16(1):154. PMC: 6819406. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0824-4. View

3.
Ross J, Agwanda A . Increased use of injectable contraception in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr J Reprod Health. 2013; 16(4):68-80. View

4.
Rossier C, Corker J . Contemporary Use of Traditional Contraception in sub-Saharan Africa. Popul Dev Rev. 2018; 43(Suppl 1):192-215. PMC: 5749414. DOI: 10.1111/padr.12008. View

5.
Rossier C, Senderowicz L, Soura A . Do natural methods count? underreporting of natural contraception in urban Burkina Faso. Stud Fam Plann. 2014; 45(2):171-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00383.x. View