» Articles » PMID: 33360497

Advances to Tackle Backbone Flexibility in Protein Docking

Overview
Date 2020 Dec 28
PMID 33360497
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Computational docking methods can provide structural models of protein-protein complexes, but protein backbone flexibility upon association often thwarts accurate predictions. In recent blind challenges, medium or high accuracy models were submitted in less than 20% of the 'difficult' targets (with significant backbone change or uncertainty). Here, we describe recent developments in protein-protein docking and highlight advances that tackle backbone flexibility. In molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo approaches, enhanced sampling techniques have reduced time-scale limitations. Internal coordinate formulations can now capture realistic motions of monomers and complexes using harmonic dynamics. And machine learning approaches adaptively guide docking trajectories or generate novel binding site predictions from deep neural networks trained on protein interfaces. These tools poise the field to break through the longstanding challenge of correctly predicting complex structures with significant conformational change.

Citing Articles

Structure-Based Identification of Non-covalent Prolyl Oligopeptidase 80 Inhibitors Targeting Cell Entry.

Costa V, Motta F, Dos Santos Carvalho A, Mendonca de Melo F, Mottin M, Charneau S J Chem Inf Model. 2025; 65(5):2636-2649.

PMID: 40007463 PMC: 11898053. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02152.


Toward the Prediction of Binding Events in Very Flexible, Allosteric, Multidomain Proteins.

Basciu A, Athar M, Kurt H, Neville C, Malloci G, Muredda F J Chem Inf Model. 2025; 65(4):2052-2065.

PMID: 39907634 PMC: 11863385. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01810.


Advancing membrane-associated protein docking with improved sampling and scoring in Rosetta.

Samanta R, Harmalkar A, Prathima P, Gray J bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39026849 PMC: 11257521. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.09.602802.


Approaches to Backbone Flexibility in Protein-Protein Docking.

Asim A Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2780:45-68.

PMID: 38987463 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_4.


Docking Foundations: From Rigid to Flexible Docking.

Kuder K Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2780:3-14.

PMID: 38987460 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3985-6_1.


References
1.
Chaudhury S, Gray J . Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles. J Mol Biol. 2008; 381(4):1068-87. PMC: 2573042. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.042. View

2.
Zacharias M . ATTRACT: protein-protein docking in CAPRI using a reduced protein model. Proteins. 2005; 60(2):252-6. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20566. View

3.
Venkatraman V, Yang Y, Sael L, Kihara D . Protein-protein docking using region-based 3D Zernike descriptors. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009; 10:407. PMC: 2800122. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-407. View

4.
Zacharias M . Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2010; 20(2):180-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.02.001. View

5.
Torchala M, Gerguri T, Chaleil R, Gordon P, Russell F, Keshani M . Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross-docking within the protein-protein docking server SwarmDock. Proteins. 2019; 88(8):962-972. PMC: 7496321. DOI: 10.1002/prot.25851. View