» Articles » PMID: 33356418

Defining the Optimal Total Number of Chemotherapy Courses in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparison of Three Versus Four Courses

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Dec 28
PMID 33356418
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The optimum number of treatment courses for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is uncertain. The United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute AML17 trial randomly assigned patients who were not high risk to a total of three versus four courses.

Patients And Methods: Patients received two induction courses based on daunorubicin and cytarabine (Ara-C), usually with gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Following remission, 1,017 patients were randomly assigned to a third course, MACE (amsacrine, Ara-C, and etoposide), plus a fourth course of MidAc (mitoxantrone and Ara-C) and following an amendment to one or two courses of high-dose Ara-C. Primary end points were cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were correlated with patient characteristics, mutations, cytogenetics, induction treatments, and measurable residual disease (MRD) postinduction.

Results: In logrank analyses, CIR and RFS at 5 years were improved in recipients of four courses (50% 58%: hazard ratio [HR] 0.81 [0.69-0.97], = .02 and 43% 36%: HR 0.83 [0.71-0.98], = .03, respectively). While OS was not significantly better (63% 57%: HR 0.84 [0.69-1.03], = .09), the noninferiority of three courses to four courses was not established. The impact on relapse was only significant when the fourth course was Ara-C. In exploratory analyses, although MRD impacted survival, a fourth course had no effect in either MRD-positive or MRD-negative patients. A fourth course was beneficial in patients who lacked a mutation of or , had < 3 mutations in other genes, or had a presenting WBC of < 10 × 10 L.

Conclusion: Although a fourth course of high-dose Ara-C reduced CIR and improved RFS, it did not result in a significant OS benefit. Subsets including those with favorable cytogenetics, those lacking a mutation of , or those with < 3 other mutations may derive survival benefit.

Citing Articles

Risk Stratification in Older Intensively Treated Patients With AML.

Versluis J, Metzner M, Wang A, Gradowska P, Thomas A, Jakobsen N J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(34):4084-4094.

PMID: 39231389 PMC: 11608593. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.02631.


Literature review and expert opinion on the treatment of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in patients who are eligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Palmieri R, Billio A, Ferrara F, Galimberti S, Lemoli R, Todisco E Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1367393.

PMID: 38444680 PMC: 10912626. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1367393.


Targeting Molecular Measurable Residual Disease and Low-Blast Relapse in AML With Venetoclax and Low-Dose Cytarabine: A Prospective Phase II Study (VALDAC).

Tiong I, Hiwase D, Abro E, Bajel A, Palfreyman E, Beligaswatte A J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(18):2161-2173.

PMID: 38427924 PMC: 11191043. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.01599.


Toxicity and outcome of adults with acute myeloid leukemia receiving consolidation with high-dose cytarabine.

Lopes L, Nucci M, Portugal R Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2023; 46(4):397-401.

PMID: 37684163 PMC: 11451373. DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2023.07.007.


Acute Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells in Minimal/Measurable Residual Disease Detection.

Srinivasan Rajsri K, Roy N, Chakraborty S Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(10).

PMID: 37345204 PMC: 10216329. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102866.


References
1.
Burnett A, Hills R, Nielsen O, Freeman S, Ali A, Cahalin P . A comparison of FLAG-Ida and daunorubicin combined with clofarabine in high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia: data from the UK NCRI AML17 Trial. Leukemia. 2018; 32(12):2693-2697. PMC: 6286330. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0148-3. View

2.
Holowiecki J, Grosicki S, Giebel S, Robak T, Kyrcz-Krzemien S, Kuliczkowski K . Cladribine, but not fludarabine, added to daunorubicin and cytarabine during induction prolongs survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter, randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(20):2441-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.1286. View

3.
Lee J, Joo Y, Kim H, Bae S, Kim M, Zang D . A randomized trial comparing standard versus high-dose daunorubicin induction in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2011; 118(14):3832-41. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-361410. View

4.
Ravandi F, Walter R, Freeman S . Evaluating measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Adv. 2018; 2(11):1356-1366. PMC: 5998930. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018016378. View

5.
Cheson B, Bennett J, Kopecky K, Buchner T, Willman C, Estey E . Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(24):4642-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.036. View