» Articles » PMID: 33355720

Simulated Basis Sets for Semi-LASER: the Impact of Including Shaped RF Pulses and Magnetic Field Gradients

Overview
Journal MAGMA
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Dec 23
PMID 33355720
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To study the need for inclusion of shaped RF pulses and magnetic field gradients in simulations of basis sets for the analysis of proton MR spectra of single voxels of the brain acquired with a semi-LASER pulse sequence.

Materials And Methods: MRS basis sets where simulated at different echo times with hard RF pulses as well as with shaped RF pulses without or with magnetic field gradients included. The influence on metabolite concentration quantification was assessed using both phantom and in vivo measurements. For comparison, simulations and measurements were performed with the PRESS pulse sequence.

Results: The effect of including gradients in the simulations was smaller for semi-LASER than for PRESS, however, still noticeable. The difference was larger for strongly coupled metabolites and at longer echo times. Metabolite quantification using semi-LASER was thereby less dependent on the inclusion of gradients than PRESS, which was seen in both phantom and in vivo measurements.

Discussion: The inclusion of the shaped RF pulses and magnetic field gradients in the simulation of basis sets for semi-LASER is only important for strongly coupled metabolites. If computational time is a limiting factor, simple simulations with hard RF pulses can provide almost as accurate metabolite quantification as those that include the chemical-shift related displacement.

Citing Articles

Improved reproducibility of γ-aminobutyric acid measurement from short-echo-time proton MR spectroscopy by linewidth-matched basis sets in LCModel.

Xiao Y, Lanz B, Lim S, Tkac I, Xin L NMR Biomed. 2023; 37(2):e5056.

PMID: 37839823 PMC: 11580110. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5056.


Signal-to-Noise Ratio Enhancement of Single-Voxel In Vivo P and H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Mice Brain Data Using Low-Rank Denoising.

Jeon Y, Park S, Chang K, Baek H Metabolites. 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36557229 PMC: 9782548. DOI: 10.3390/metabo12121191.


MRSCloud: A cloud-based MRS tool for basis set simulation.

Hui S, Saleh M, Zollner H, Oeltzschner G, Fan H, Li Y Magn Reson Med. 2022; 88(5):1994-2004.

PMID: 35775808 PMC: 9420769. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29370.

References
1.
Port J . Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Psychiatry: Progress in the Last Decade. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2019; 30(1):25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2019.09.002. View

2.
Zhang Y, An L, Shen J . Fast computation of full density matrix of multispin systems for spatially localized in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Med Phys. 2017; 44(8):4169-4178. PMC: 5578626. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12375. View

3.
Oz G, Deelchand D, Wijnen J, Mlynarik V, Xin L, Mekle R . Advanced single voxel H magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques in humans: Experts' consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed. 2020; :e4236. PMC: 7347431. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4236. View

4.
Govindaraju V, Young K, Maudsley A . Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites. NMR Biomed. 2000; 13(3):129-53. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1492(200005)13:3<129::aid-nbm619>3.0.co;2-v. View

5.
Wilson M, Davies N, Sun Y, Natarajan K, Arvanitis T, Kauppinen R . A comparison between simulated and experimental basis sets for assessing short-TE in vivo ¹H MRS data at 1.5 T. NMR Biomed. 2010; 23(10):1117-26. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1538. View