» Articles » PMID: 33351841

Regionalization for Health Improvement: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Dec 22
PMID 33351841
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Regionalization is the integrated organization of a healthcare system, wherein regional structures are responsible for providing and administrating health services in a specific region. This method was adopted by several countries to improve the quality of provided care and to properly utilize available resources. Thus, a systematic review was conducted to verify effective interventions to improve health and management indicators within the health services regionalization. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016042314). We performed a systematic search in databases during February and March 2017 which was updated in October 2020. There was no language or date restriction. We included experimental and observational studies with interventions focused on regionalization-related actions, measures or policies aimed at decentralizing and organizing health offerings, rationalizing scarce capital and human resources, coordinating health services. A methodological assessment of the studies was performed using instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute and GRADE was also used to assess outcomes. Thirty-nine articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria and sixteen interventions were identified that indicated different degrees of recommendations for improving the management of health system regionalization. The results showed that regionalization was effective under administrative decentralization and for rationalization of resources. The most investigated intervention was the strategy of concentrating procedures in high-volume hospitals, which showed positive outcomes, especially with the reduction of hospitalization days and in-hospital mortality rates. When implementing regionalization, it must be noted that it involves changes in current standards of health practice and in the distribution of health resources, especially for specialized services.

Citing Articles

Effect on Travel Distance of a Statewide Regionalization Policy for Initial Breast Cancer Surgery.

Bickell N, Nattinger A, McGinley E, Schymura M, Laud P, Pezzin L J Clin Oncol. 2024; 43(1):57-64.

PMID: 39348624 PMC: 11663124. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.02638.


Using the Stratum-Specific Likelihood Ratio Method to Derive Outcome-Based Hospital Volume Categories for Total Knee Replacement.

Ghomrawi H, Huang L, Hiredesai A, French D Med Care. 2024; 62(4):250-255.

PMID: 38373237 PMC: 10939781. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001985.


How to direct patients to high-volume hospitals: exploring the influencing drivers.

Listorti E, Pastore E, Alfieri A BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):1269.

PMID: 37974191 PMC: 10655263. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10229-9.


A Fuzzy BWM-TOPSIS Framework for Identifying and Prioritizing Measures to Overcome Obstacles to the Regionalization of Iranian Healthcare Services.

Zare Z, Haqbin A, Kalavani K, Shojaei P Int J Prev Med. 2023; 14:55.

PMID: 37351041 PMC: 10284241. DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_114_22.


Is there a relationship between surgical volume and outcome for total elbow arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Prkic A, Vermeulen N, Kooistra B, The B, van den Bekerom M, Eygendaal D EFORT Open Rev. 2023; 8(1):45-51.

PMID: 36705616 PMC: 9969007. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-22-0087.

References
1.
Nimptsch U, Mansky T . Hospital volume and mortality for 25 types of inpatient treatment in German hospitals: observational study using complete national data from 2009 to 2014. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(9):e016184. PMC: 5589035. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016184. View

2.
Glasgow R, Showstack J, Katz P, Corvera C, Warren R, Mulvihill S . The relationship between hospital volume and outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg. 1999; 134(1):30-5. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.134.1.30. View

3.
Finks J, Osborne N, Birkmeyer J . Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(22):2128-37. PMC: 3150488. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1010705. View

4.
Bardach N, Olson S, Elkins J, Smith W, Lawton M, Johnston S . Regionalization of treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cost-utility analysis. Circulation. 2004; 109(18):2207-12. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000126433.12527.E6. View

5.
Imperato P, Nenner R, Starr H, Will T, Rosenberg C, Dearie M . The effects of regionalization on clinical outcomes for a high risk surgical procedure: a study of the Whipple procedure in New York State. Am J Med Qual. 1996; 11(4):193-7. DOI: 10.1177/0885713X9601100407. View