» Articles » PMID: 33351127

Prognostic and Predictive Performance of R-ISS with SKY92 in Older Patients with Multiple Myeloma: the HOVON-87/NMSG-18 Trial

Abstract

The standard prognostic marker for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is the revised International Staging System (R-ISS). However, there is room for improvement in guiding treatment. This applies particularly to older patients, in whom the benefit/risk ratio is reduced because of comorbidities and subsequent side effects. We hypothesized that adding gene-expression data to R-ISS would generate a stronger marker. This was tested by combining R-ISS with the SKY92 classifier (SKY-RISS). The HOVON-87/NMSG-18 trial (EudraCT: 2007-004007-34) compared melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by thalidomide maintenance (MPT-T) with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide followed by lenalidomide maintenance (MPR-R). From this trial, 168 patients with available R-ISS status and gene-expression profiles were analyzed. R-ISS stages I, II, and III were assigned to 8%, 75%, and 7% of patients, respectively (3-year overall survival [OS] rates: 80%, 65%, 33%, P = 8 × 10-3). Using the SKY92 classifier, 13% of patients were high risk (HR) (3-year OS rates: standard risk [SR], 70%; HR, 28%; P < .001). Combining SKY92 with R-ISS resulted in 3 risk groups: SKY-RISS I (SKY-SR + R-ISS-I; 15%), SKY-RISS III (SKY-HR + R-ISS-II/III; 11%), and SKY-RISS II (all other patients; 74%). The 3-year OS rates for SKY-RISS I, II, and III are 88%, 66%, and 26%, respectively (P = 6 × 10-7). The SKY-RISS model was validated in older patients from the CoMMpass dataset. Moreover, SKY-RISS demonstrated predictive potential: HR patients appeared to benefit from MPR-R over MPT-T (median OS, 55 and 14 months, respectively). Combined, SKY92 and R-ISS classify patients more accurately. Additionally, benefit was observed for MPR-R over MPT-T in SKY92-RISS HR patients only.

Citing Articles

Combining SKY92 gene expression profiling and FISH (according to R2-ISS) defines ultra-high-risk Multiple Myeloma.

Zhou X, Hofmann A, Engel B, Vogt C, Nerreter S, Tamamushi Y Hemasphere. 2025; 9(1):e70078.

PMID: 39850647 PMC: 11754766. DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70078.


Characterization of driver mutations identifies gene signatures predictive of prognosis and treatment sensitivity in multiple myeloma.

Li J, Parthasarathy A, Kannappan A, Arsang-Jang S, Dong J, Cheng C Oncologist. 2024; 29(11):e1552-e1564.

PMID: 39250742 PMC: 11639189. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae244.


Multi-dimensional scaling techniques unveiled gain1q&loss13q co-occurrence in Multiple Myeloma patients with specific genomic, transcriptional and adverse clinical features.

Terragna C, Poletti A, Solli V, Martello M, Zamagni E, Pantani L Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):1551.

PMID: 38378709 PMC: 10879136. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45000-z.


A rational approach to functional high-risk myeloma.

Gay F, Bertuglia G, Mina R Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023; 2023(1):433-442.

PMID: 38066896 PMC: 10727111. DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2023000443.


Current Main Topics in Multiple Myeloma.

More S, Corvatta L, Manieri V, Olivieri A, Offidani M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(8).

PMID: 37190132 PMC: 10136770. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082203.


References
1.
Kuiper R, Broyl A, de Knegt Y, van Vliet M, van Beers E, van der Holt B . A gene expression signature for high-risk multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2012; 26(11):2406-13. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2012.127. View

2.
Goldsmith S, Fiala M, Dukeman J, Ghobadi A, Stockerl-Goldstein K, Schroeder M . Next Generation Sequencing-based Validation of the Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: An Analysis of the MMRF CoMMpass Study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019; 19(5):285-289. DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.01.003. View

3.
Miller A, Asmann Y, Cattaneo L, Braggio E, Keats J, Auclair D . High somatic mutation and neoantigen burden are correlated with decreased progression-free survival in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2017; 7(9):e612. PMC: 5709757. DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2017.94. View

4.
Morgan G, Gregory W, Davies F, Bell S, Szubert A, Brown J . The role of maintenance thalidomide therapy in multiple myeloma: MRC Myeloma IX results and meta-analysis. Blood. 2011; 119(1):7-15. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-357038. View

5.
Waage A, Gimsing P, Fayers P, Abildgaard N, Ahlberg L, Bjorkstrand B . Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010; 116(9):1405-12. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-237974. View