Prognostic and Predictive Performance of R-ISS with SKY92 in Older Patients with Multiple Myeloma: the HOVON-87/NMSG-18 Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The standard prognostic marker for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is the revised International Staging System (R-ISS). However, there is room for improvement in guiding treatment. This applies particularly to older patients, in whom the benefit/risk ratio is reduced because of comorbidities and subsequent side effects. We hypothesized that adding gene-expression data to R-ISS would generate a stronger marker. This was tested by combining R-ISS with the SKY92 classifier (SKY-RISS). The HOVON-87/NMSG-18 trial (EudraCT: 2007-004007-34) compared melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by thalidomide maintenance (MPT-T) with melphalan-prednisone-lenalidomide followed by lenalidomide maintenance (MPR-R). From this trial, 168 patients with available R-ISS status and gene-expression profiles were analyzed. R-ISS stages I, II, and III were assigned to 8%, 75%, and 7% of patients, respectively (3-year overall survival [OS] rates: 80%, 65%, 33%, P = 8 × 10-3). Using the SKY92 classifier, 13% of patients were high risk (HR) (3-year OS rates: standard risk [SR], 70%; HR, 28%; P < .001). Combining SKY92 with R-ISS resulted in 3 risk groups: SKY-RISS I (SKY-SR + R-ISS-I; 15%), SKY-RISS III (SKY-HR + R-ISS-II/III; 11%), and SKY-RISS II (all other patients; 74%). The 3-year OS rates for SKY-RISS I, II, and III are 88%, 66%, and 26%, respectively (P = 6 × 10-7). The SKY-RISS model was validated in older patients from the CoMMpass dataset. Moreover, SKY-RISS demonstrated predictive potential: HR patients appeared to benefit from MPR-R over MPT-T (median OS, 55 and 14 months, respectively). Combined, SKY92 and R-ISS classify patients more accurately. Additionally, benefit was observed for MPR-R over MPT-T in SKY92-RISS HR patients only.
Zhou X, Hofmann A, Engel B, Vogt C, Nerreter S, Tamamushi Y Hemasphere. 2025; 9(1):e70078.
PMID: 39850647 PMC: 11754766. DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70078.
Li J, Parthasarathy A, Kannappan A, Arsang-Jang S, Dong J, Cheng C Oncologist. 2024; 29(11):e1552-e1564.
PMID: 39250742 PMC: 11639189. DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae244.
Terragna C, Poletti A, Solli V, Martello M, Zamagni E, Pantani L Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):1551.
PMID: 38378709 PMC: 10879136. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45000-z.
A rational approach to functional high-risk myeloma.
Gay F, Bertuglia G, Mina R Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2023; 2023(1):433-442.
PMID: 38066896 PMC: 10727111. DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2023000443.
Current Main Topics in Multiple Myeloma.
More S, Corvatta L, Manieri V, Olivieri A, Offidani M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(8).
PMID: 37190132 PMC: 10136770. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082203.