» Articles » PMID: 33348644

One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Dec 22
PMID 33348644
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: (PRIMARY) Assess the changes in bone level (6 and 12 months after implant placement) between the test (definitive abutment (DEF)) and control (healing abutment (HEA)) groups. (SECONDARY) Assess the changes in bone level (6 and 12 months after implant placement) between the 1 mm high abutment group and 2 mm abutment group. Evaluate changes in implant stability recorded with analysis of the resonance frequency (RFA) Osstell system, at 6 and 12 months after implant placement, between the control group (HEA) and test (DEF). For the DEF group, the abutment was placed at the time of the surgery and was never removed. For the HEA group, the abutment was removed three times during the manufacture of the crowns. The abutments used were 1 mm high (Subgroup A) and 2 mm high (Subgroup B). Materials and methods: A total of 147 patients were selected between 54.82 ± 11.92 years old. After implant placement, patients were randomly distributed in the DEF and HEA group. After the implant placement, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the peri-implant bone level; the same procedure was carried out 6 and 12 months post-placement. To compare the qualitative variables between the groups (HEA/DEF), the Chi-square test was used; for quantitative (MANOVA). : After a year, the accumulated bone loss was 0.48 ± 0.71 mm for the HEA group and 0.36 ± 0.79 mm for the DEF group, without statistical significance. Differences were only found due to timing (time) between 0 and 6 months (=0.001) and 0 and 12 months (0.001), with no differences attributable to the study groups (DEF and HEA). The accumulated bone loss (1 year) was 0.45 ± 0.78 mm for the 1 mm abutment group and 0.41 ± 0.70 mm for the 2 mm abutment group ( = 0.02). No differences were observed in implant stability between groups. : The "One Abutment-One Time" concept does not reduce peri-implant bone loss compared to the connection-disconnection technique. The height of the abutment does influence bone loss: the higher the abutment, the lower the bone loss.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical evaluation of abutment stability in morse taper implant connections in different times: A retrospective clinical study compared with an in vitro analysis.

Gehrke S, Cortellari G, De Aza P, Lima J, Prados Frutos J Heliyon. 2023; 9(4):e15312.

PMID: 37151670 PMC: 10161598. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15312.


Primary stability of different implant macrodesigns in a sinus floor elevation simulated model: an ex vivo study.

Imai M, Ogino Y, Tanaka H, Koyano K, Ayukawa Y, Toyoshima T BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1):332.

PMID: 35941575 PMC: 9361700. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02345-5.


The Association of the One-Abutment at One-Time Concept with Marginal Bone Loss around the SLA and Platform Switch and Conical Abutment Implants.

Hamudi N, Barnea E, Weinberg E, Laviv A, Mijiritsky E, Matalon S J Clin Med. 2022; 11(1).

PMID: 35011814 PMC: 8745541. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010074.

References
1.
Grandi T, Guazzi P, Samarani R, Garuti G . Immediate positioning of definitive abutments versus repeated abutment replacements in immediately loaded implants: effects on bone healing at the 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012; 5(1):9-16. View

2.
Machtei E, Christersson L, Grossi S, Dunford R, Zambon J, Genco R . Clinical criteria for the definition of "established periodontitis". J Periodontol. 1992; 63(3):206-14. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.3.206. View

3.
Herrero-Climent M, Albertini M, Rios-Santos J, Lazaro-Calvo P, Fernandez-Palacin A, Bullon P . Resonance frequency analysis-reliability in third generation instruments: Osstell mentor®. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012; 17(5):e801-6. PMC: 3482525. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.17861. View

4.
Molina A, Sanz-Sanchez I, Martin C, Blanco J, Sanz M . The effect of one-time abutment placement on interproximal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissues: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 28(4):443-452. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12818. View

5.
Cappare P, Sannino G, Minoli M, Montemezzi P, Ferrini F . Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(5). PMC: 6427545. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16050829. View