» Articles » PMID: 33343458

Pedestrians' Understanding of a Fully Autonomous Vehicle's Intent to Stop: A Learning Effect Over Time

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2020 Dec 21
PMID 33343458
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study explored pedestrians' understanding of Fully Autonomous Vehicles (FAVs) intention to stop and what influences pedestrians' decision to cross the road over time, i.e., learnability. Twenty participants saw fixed simulated urban road crossing scenes with a single FAV on the road as if they were pedestrians intending to cross. Scenes differed from one another in the FAV's, distance from the crossing place, its physical size, and external Human-Machine Interfaces (e-HMI) message by background color (red/green), message type (status/advice), and presentation modality (text/symbol). Eye-tracking data and decision measurements were collected. Results revealed that pedestrians tend to look at the e-HMI before making their decision. However, they did not necessarily decide according to the e-HMIs' color or message type. Moreover, when they complied with the e-HMI proposition, they tended to hesitate before making the decision. Overall, a learning effect over time was observed in all conditions regardless of e- HMI features and crossing context. Findings suggest that pedestrians' decision making depends on a combination of the e-HMI implementation and the car distance. Moreover, since the learning curve exists in all conditions and has the same proportion, it is critical to design an interaction that would encourage higher probability of compatible decisions from the first phase. However, to extend all these findings, it is necessary to further examine dynamic situations.

Citing Articles

Comparison of LSTM, Transformers, and MLP-mixer neural networks for gaze based human intention prediction.

Pettersson J, Falkman P Front Neurorobot. 2023; 17:1157957.

PMID: 37304663 PMC: 10248176. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1157957.

References
1.
Tapiro H, Oron-Gilad T, Parmet Y . Pedestrian distraction: The effects of road environment complexity and age on pedestrian's visual attention and crossing behavior. J Safety Res. 2020; 72:101-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.003. View

2.
Bazilinskyy P, Kooijman L, Dodou D, de Winter J . How should external human-machine interfaces behave? Examining the effects of colour, position, message, activation distance, vehicle yielding, and visual distraction among 1,434 participants. Appl Ergon. 2021; 95:103450. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103450. View

3.
Rouchitsas A, Alm H . External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication: A Review of Empirical Work. Front Psychol. 2020; 10:2757. PMC: 6916419. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02757. View

4.
Ginsburg A . A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984; 61(6):403-7. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-198406000-00011. View

5.
Ackermann C, Beggiato M, Schubert S, Krems J . An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles?. Appl Ergon. 2018; 75:272-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.11.002. View