What Constitutes Good Ethical Practice in Genomic Research in Africa? Perspectives of Participants in a Genomic Research Study in Uganda

Overview

Journal Glob Bioeth

Specialty Medical Ethics

Date 2020 Dec 21

PMID 33343191

Citations 19

Authors

Rwamahe Rutakumwa

Jantina de Vries

Michael Parker

Paulina Tindana

Oliver Mweemba

Janet Seeley

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Previous research has consistently highlighted the importance of stakeholder engagement in identifying and developing solutions to ethical challenges in genomic research, especially in Africa where such research is relatively new. In this paper, we examine what constitutes good ethical practice in research, from the perspectives of genomic research participants in Uganda. Our study was part of a multi-site qualitative study exploring these issues in Uganda, Ghana and Zambia. We purposively sampled various stakeholders including genomic research participants, researchers, research ethics committee members, policy makers and community members. This paper presents the findings from in-depth interviews with 27 people with diabetes who had participated in a diabetes genomic study. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Manual thematic content analysis was conducted using a framework approach. Findings indicate three key requirements that research participants see as vital for genomic research to be more responsive to research participants' needs and contextual realities: (1) de-emphasising the role of experts and institutions in the consenting process, (2) clarity about the timing and nature of feedback both of findings relevant to the health of individuals and about the broad progress of the study, and (3) more effective support for research participants during and after the study.

Citing Articles

"A Call To Action": The need for genetic counseling in Uganda.

Adzemovic T, Kabbale K, Katagirya E, Mukisa J, Wayengera M Genet Med Open. 2024; 2(Suppl 2):101879.

PMID: 39712973 PMC: 11658546. DOI: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101879.

How to communicate and what to disclose to participants in a recall-by-genotype research approach: a multistep empirical study.

Tschigg K, Consoli L, Bruggemann N, Hicks A, Staunton C, Mascalzoni D J Community Genet. 2024; 15(6):615-630.

PMID: 39325315 PMC: 11645387. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00733-8.

Charting a landmark-driven path forward for population genetics and ancient DNA research in Africa.

Sawchuk E, Sirak K, Manthi F, Ndiema E, Ogola C, Prendergast M Am J Hum Genet. 2024; 111(7):1243-1251.

PMID: 38996465 PMC: 11267517. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.05.019.

Community engagement in genetics and genomics research: a qualitative study of the perspectives of genetics and genomics researchers in Uganda.

Nankya H, Wamala E, Alibu V, Barugahare J BMC Med Ethics. 2024; 25(1):1.

PMID: 38166828 PMC: 10763360. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00995-w.

Ethical considerations for genetic research in low-income countries: perceptions of informed consent, data sharing, and expectations in Nicaragua.

Delgado I, Outterson A, Ramesh V, Amador Sanchez A, Boza A, Lopez-Pilarte D Eur J Hum Genet. 2023; 32(10):1278-1284.

PMID: 38052907 PMC: 11500004. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01505-7.

References

Upshur R, Lavery J, Tindana P . Taking tissue seriously means taking communities seriously. BMC Med Ethics. 2007; 8:11. PMC: 2151950. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-11. View

U S Department Of Health And Human Services . Opioid abuse in the United States and Department of Health and Human Services actions to address opioid-drug-related overdoses and deaths. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015; 29(2):133-9. DOI: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1037530. View

Smith J, Firth J . Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach. Nurse Res. 2011; 18(2):52-62. DOI: 10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.52.c8284. View

Carrieri D, Bewshea C, Walker G, Ahmad T, Bowen W, Hall A . Ethical issues and best practice in clinically based genomic research: Exeter Stakeholders Meeting Report. J Med Ethics. 2016; 42(11):695-697. PMC: 5136727. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103530. View

Wright G, Koornhof P, Adeyemo A, Tiffin N . Ethical and legal implications of whole genome and whole exome sequencing in African populations. BMC Med Ethics. 2013; 14:21. PMC: 3668248. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-21. View

Stein D, Terry S . Reforming biobank consent policy: a necessary move away from broad consent toward dynamic consent. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013; 17(12):855-6. DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.1550. View

Tekola F, Bull S, Farsides B, Newport M, Adeyemo A, Rotimi C . Tailoring consent to context: designing an appropriate consent process for a biomedical study in a low income setting. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009; 3(7):e482. PMC: 2705797. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000482. View

Bredenoord A, Onland-Moret N, van Delden J . Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy. Hum Mutat. 2011; 32(8):861-7. DOI: 10.1002/humu.21518. View

Nyika A . Ethical and practical challenges surrounding genetic and genomic research in developing countries. Acta Trop. 2009; 112 Suppl 1:S21-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.07.034. View

10.

Gale N, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S . Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:117. PMC: 3848812. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117. View

11.

Tindana P, de Vries J, Campbell M, Littler K, Seeley J, Marshall P . Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: a review of the literature. BMC Med Ethics. 2015; 16:24. PMC: 4407431. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0014-z. View

12.

Bredenoord A, Kroes H, Cuppen E, Parker M, van Delden J . Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered. Trends Genet. 2010; 27(2):41-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.11.004. View

13.

de Vries J, Bull S, Doumbo O, Ibrahim M, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Kwiatkowski D . Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries. BMC Med Ethics. 2011; 12:5. PMC: 3076260. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-5. View

14.

Marsh V, Kombe F, Fitzpatrick R, Williams T, Parker M, Molyneux S . Consulting communities on feedback of genetic findings in international health research: sharing sickle cell disease and carrier information in coastal Kenya. BMC Med Ethics. 2013; 14:41. PMC: 4016314. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-41. View

15.

Kaye J, Whitley E, Lund D, Morrison M, Teare H, Melham K . Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014; 23(2):141-6. PMC: 4130658. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.71. View

16.

Munung N, Marshall P, Campbell M, Littler K, Masiye F, Ouwe-Missi-Oukem-Boyer O . Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents. J Med Ethics. 2015; 42(2):132-7. PMC: 4752624. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102796. View

17.

Ahmed S, Palermo A . Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(8):1380-7. PMC: 2901283. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.178137. View

18.

Cambon-Thomsen A, Rial-Sebbag E, Knoppers B . Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks. Eur Respir J. 2007; 30(2):373-82. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00165006. View

19.

Robinson J, Slashinski M, Wang T, Hilsenbeck S, McGuire A . Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013; 8(4):42-52. PMC: 3995160. DOI: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.42. View

20.

Emerson C, Singer P, Upshur R . Access and use of human tissues from the developing world: ethical challenges and a way forward using a tissue trust. BMC Med Ethics. 2011; 12:2. PMC: 3038983. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-2. View