» Articles » PMID: 33341984

Comparison of Four Methods to Measure Haemoglobin Concentrations in Whole Blood Donors (COMPARE): A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Abstract

Objective: To compare four haemoglobin measurement methods in whole blood donors.

Background: To safeguard donors, blood services measure haemoglobin concentration in advance of each donation. NHS Blood and Transplant's (NHSBT) customary method have been capillary gravimetry (copper sulphate), followed by venous spectrophotometry (HemoCue) for donors failing gravimetry. However, NHSBT's customary method results in 10% of donors being inappropriately bled (ie, with haemoglobin values below the regulatory threshold).

Methods: We compared the following four methods in 21 840 blood donors (aged ≥18 years) recruited from 10 NHSBT centres in England, with the Sysmex XN-2000 haematology analyser, the reference standard: (1) NHSBT's customary method; (2) "post donation" approach, that is, estimating current haemoglobin concentration from that measured by a haematology analyser at a donor's most recent prior donation; (3) "portable haemoglobinometry" (using capillary HemoCue); (4) non-invasive spectrometry (using MBR Haemospect or Orsense NMB200). We assessed sensitivity; specificity; proportion who would have been inappropriately bled, or rejected from donation ("deferred") incorrectly; and test preference.

Results: Compared with the reference standard, the methods ranged in test sensitivity from 17.0% (MBR Haemospect) to 79.0% (portable haemoglobinometry) in men, and from 19.0% (MBR Haemospect) to 82.8% (portable haemoglobinometry) in women. For specificity, the methods ranged from 87.2% (MBR Haemospect) to 99.9% (NHSBT's customary method) in men, and from 74.1% (Orsense NMB200) to 99.8% (NHSBT's customary method) in women. The proportion of donors who would have been inappropriately bled ranged from 2.2% in men for portable haemoglobinometry to 18.9% in women for MBR Haemospect. The proportion of donors who would have been deferred incorrectly with haemoglobin concentration above the minimum threshold ranged from 0.1% in men for NHSBT's customary method to 20.3% in women for OrSense. Most donors preferred non-invasive spectrometry.

Conclusion: In the largest study reporting head-to-head comparisons of four methods to measure haemoglobin prior to blood donation, our results support replacement of NHSBT's customary method with portable haemoglobinometry.

Citing Articles

Assessing the kinetics of oxygen-unloading from red cells using FlowScore, a flow-cytometric proxy of the functional quality of blood.

Rabcuka J, Smethurst P, Dammert K, Saker J, Aran G, Walsh G EBioMedicine. 2024; 111:105498.

PMID: 39674089 PMC: 11730303. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105498.


[Comparison of a portable hemoglobinometer (Verio Q Red) with clinical laboratory results in routine clinical practice].

Trenado-Luengo B, Garcia-Sierra R, Moreno Gomez V, Montenegro Calvo M, Anguita Lapido J, Toran-Monserrat P Aten Primaria. 2024; 57(2):103080.

PMID: 39270581 PMC: 11415527. DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103080.


Prenatal anaemia and risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a cohort analysis of data from the Predict-PPH study.

Okunade K, Adejimi A, Olumodeji A, Olowe A, Oyedeji O, Ademuyiwa I BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1028.

PMID: 38609913 PMC: 11015669. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18446-5.


Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial.

McMahon A, Kaptoge S, Walker M, Mehenny S, Gilchrist P, Sambrook J Trials. 2023; 24(1):512.

PMID: 37563721 PMC: 10413586. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z.


Maternal anaemia and the risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a cohort analysis of data from the WOMAN-2 trial.

Lancet Glob Health. 2023; 11(8):e1249-e1259.

PMID: 37390833 PMC: 10353972. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00245-0.


References
1.
Chaudhary R, Dubey A, Sonker A . Techniques used for the screening of hemoglobin levels in blood donors: current insights and future directions. J Blood Med. 2017; 8:75-88. PMC: 5503668. DOI: 10.2147/JBM.S103788. View

2.
Rigas A, Pedersen O, Magnussen K, Erikstrup C, Ullum H . Iron deficiency among blood donors: experience from the Danish Blood Donor Study and from the Copenhagen ferritin monitoring scheme. Transfus Med. 2017; 29 Suppl 1:23-27. DOI: 10.1111/tme.12477. View

3.
Avcioglu G, Nural C, Yilmaz F, Baran P, Erel O, Yilmaz G . Comparison of noninvasive and invasive point-of-care testing methods with reference method for hemoglobin measurement. J Clin Lab Anal. 2017; 32(3). PMC: 6816839. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22309. View

4.
Shvartsman L, Fine I . Optical transmission of blood: effect of erythrocyte aggregation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003; 50(8):1026-33. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2003.814532. View

5.
James V, Jones K, Turner E, Sokol R . Statistical analysis of inappropriate results from current Hb screening methods for blood donors. Transfusion. 2003; 43(3):400-4. DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00316.x. View