» Articles » PMID: 33339093

Clinical Evaluation of a Newly Developed Guidewire for Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy

Abstract

Background: The guidewire (GW) plays an important role in pancreatobiliary endoscopy. GW quality is a critical factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of pancreatobiliary endoscopy. In this study, we evaluate a new 0.025 inch multipurpose endoscopic GW: the M-Through.

Methods: Our study was a multicenter retrospective analysis. We enrolled patients who underwent endoscopic procedures using the M-Through between May 2018 and April 2020. Patients receiving the following endoscopic treatments were enrolled: common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction, endoscopic drainage for distal and hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), and endoscopic drainage for acute cholecystitis. For each procedure, we examined the rate of success without GW exchange.

Results: A total of 170 patients (80 with CBD stones, 60 with MBO, and 30 with cholecystitis) were enrolled. The rate of completion without GW exchange was 100% for CBD stone extraction, 83.3% for endoscopic drainage for MBO, and 43.3% for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. In unsuccessful cholecystitis cases with the original GW manipulator, 1 of 8 cases succeeded in the manipulator exchange. Including 6 cases who changed GW after the manipulator exchange, 11 of 16 cases succeeded in changing GW. There was significant difference in the success rate between the manipulator exchange and GW exchange ( = 0.03). The insertion of devices and stent placement after biliary cannulation (regardless of type) were almost completed with M-through. We observed no intraoperative GW-related adverse events such as perforation and bleeding due to manipulation.

Conclusion: The 0.025 inch M-Through can be used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related procedures efficiently and safely. Our study found high rates of success without GW exchange in all procedures except for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. This GW is considered (1) excellent for supportability of device insertion to remove CBD stones; (2) good for seeking the biliary malignant stricture but sometimes need the help of a hydrophilic GW; (3) suboptimal for gallbladder drainage that require a high level of seeking ability.

Citing Articles

Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation With or Without Endoscopic Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones.

Wang J, Cao L, Xue K, Qi P, Mao Q, Cui M Dig Dis Sci. 2024; 70(2):478-493.

PMID: 39708261 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08797-9.


Structural factors influencing the clinical performance of 0.025-inch guidewires for pancreatobiliary endoscopy: An experimental study.

Koga T, Tsuchiya N, Ishida Y, Kitaguchi T, Matsumoto K, Fukuyama M Endosc Int Open. 2024; 12(5):E666-E675.

PMID: 38707594 PMC: 11068439. DOI: 10.1055/a-2290-0363.


Comparison of guidewires for successful cannulation of biliary stenosis and targeting of biliary branches in ERCP.

Kobayashi M, Katsuda H, Ohtsuka K, Okamoto R Endosc Int Open. 2023; 11(9):E805-E810.

PMID: 37664788 PMC: 10473887. DOI: 10.1055/a-2131-5145.


Predictive value of the Fibrosis-4 index in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Sudo M, Shamekhi J, Sedaghat A, Aksoy A, Zietzer A, Tanaka T Clin Res Cardiol. 2022; 111(12):1367-1376.

PMID: 35852581 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-02055-6.


Recent Advances in Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopic Intervention: How to Resolve Unmet Needs in Pancreato-Biliary Diseases Endoscopically.

Isayama H, Ishii S, Tomishima K, Fujisawa T J Clin Med. 2022; 11(13).

PMID: 35806922 PMC: 9267574. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133637.

References
1.
Sobani Z, Ling C, Rustagi T . Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2020; 66(5):1425-1435. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06422-z. View

2.
Furuzono M, Hirata N, Saitou J, Nakaji S . A rare complication during ERCP and sphincterotomy: placement of an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube in the portal vein. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70(3):588-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.255. View

3.
Kitamura K, Yamamiya A, Ishii Y, Sato Y, Iwata T, Nomoto T . 0.025-inch vs 0.035-inch guide wires for wire-guided cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A randomized study. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(30):9182-8. PMC: 4533051. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9182. View

4.
Kawakami H, Maguchi H, Mukai T, Hayashi T, Sasaki T, Isayama H . A multicenter, prospective, randomized study of selective bile duct cannulation performed by multiple endoscopists: the BIDMEN study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75(2):362-72, 372.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.012. View

5.
Park J, Jeong S, Lee D . Effectiveness of a novel highly flexible-tip guidewire on selective biliary cannulation compared to conventional guidewire: Randomized controlled study. Dig Endosc. 2017; 30(2):245-251. DOI: 10.1111/den.12924. View