» Articles » PMID: 33338879

Differentiation Between Suture Recurrence and Suture Granuloma After Pulmonary Resection for Lung Cancer by Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging or FDG-PET / CT

Overview
Journal Transl Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Dec 18
PMID 33338879
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has been no publication which supports the usefulness of DWI differentiating for suture recurrence and suture granuloma after resection for lung cancer. We presented efficacy of DWI or FDG-PET/CT for an assessment of suture lesions after resection for lung cancer. Thirteen suture recurrences and 15 suture granulomas were examined. There were 24 adenocarcinomas and 4 squamous cell carcinomas, and 26 partial resections and 2 segmentectomies. The period of time (907±907 days) between surgery and suture recurrence was not significantly longer than that (546±547 days) between surgery and suture granuloma. Diffusion detectability scores (a 5-point scale) of suture recurrences was significantly higher than that of suture granulomas. The ADC value (1.35±0.24 × 10mm/sec) of suture recurrences was significantly lower than that (1.85±0.60 × 10mm/sec) of suture granulomas. The SUVmax (6.1 ± 5.0) of suture recurrences was not significantly higher than that (4.2 ± 2.5) of suture granulmas. The sensitivity of 85% (11/13) with DWI was not significantly higher than 69% (9/13) with FDG-PET/CT for suture recurrences. The specificity of 73% (11/15) with DWI was not significantly higher than the 60% (9/15) with FDG-PET/CT for suture granulomas. The accuracy of 79% (22/28) with DWI was not significantly higher than that of 64% (18/28) with FDG-PET/CT for suture recurrences and granulomas. DWI can differentiate suture granuloma from suture recurrence after resection of lung cancer. DWI is more useful than FDG-PET/CT for the differentiation between suture recurrence and suture granuloma after resection for lung cancer.

Citing Articles

Medical management of post-sublobar resection pulmonary granulomatous lesion: a report of two cases.

Endoh H, Oura N, Yanagisawa S, Morozumi N, Nishizawa N, Yamamoto R Surg Case Rep. 2024; 10(1):193.

PMID: 39164535 PMC: 11335699. DOI: 10.1186/s40792-024-01969-9.


Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating pulmonary lesions: an updated meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Liu J, Xia X, Zou Q, Xie X, Lei Y, Wan Q BMC Med Imaging. 2023; 23(1):37.

PMID: 36899303 PMC: 10007793. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-00990-y.


The difference of auxiliary examination parameters between margin recurrence and granuloma on enhanced computed tomography after sublobar resection.

Zheng J, Sun Z, Zhang D, Zhao X, Wei H J Thorac Dis. 2022; 14(8):2997-3007.

PMID: 36071761 PMC: 9442524. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-987.


Editorial on "robotic versus thoracoscopic combined anatomic subsegmentectomy for early stage lung cancer: early results of a cohort study".

Miyazaki T, Nagayasu T J Thorac Dis. 2022; 14(6):1744-1747.

PMID: 35813715 PMC: 9264064. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2022-06.


Differentiation between staple line granuloma and recurrence after sublobar resection for primary lung cancer.

Matsuura N, Igai H, Ohsawa F, Yazawa T, Kamiyoshihara M J Thorac Dis. 2022; 14(1):26-35.

PMID: 35242365 PMC: 8828522. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-1626.