» Articles » PMID: 33333410

New Treatment Strategy for Endometriosis Using Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation with Dienogest: A Prospective Cohort Study, Comparison of Dienogest Versus Dydrogesterone

Overview
Journal Reprod Biol
Date 2020 Dec 17
PMID 33333410
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dienogest (DNG) is an oral progestin effective for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis, such as reduction of endometrial lesion and control of pain intensity. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is a new controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) regimen, and several reports have shown that dydrogesterone (DYG) is an appropriate progestin for PPOS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of DNG in patients undergoing PPOS during COH in comparison with DYG. This was a prospective, cohort, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial of 150 women with endometriosis undergoing assisted reproductive technology between February 2018 and May 2020 at the single fertility center. The assignment to each protocol was based on the optimal treatment for each patient. Patients taking DNG 2 mg continuously were assigned in the DNG group(n = 73). The other patients were allocated in DYG group(n = 77). All viable embryos were cryopreserved for subsequent transfer. The main outcome measures were the mature oocyte and fertilization rates. During this study, no premature LH surge was detected. A smaller number of oocytes were retrieved in the DNG group than in the DYG group (6.18 ± 3.60 vs. 9.85 ± 5.77); however, the rate of mature oocytes was significantly higher in the DNG group than in the DYG group (89.1 % vs. 78.9 %). The fertilization rate was comparable between two groups. Therefore, patients taking DNG for PPOS can continue endometriosis treatment and obtain good-quality embryos during COH. Further prospective randomized-controlled trial should be performed to confirm of this novel strategy of DNG.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Dydrogesterone and GnRH-a Effects After Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients with Stage III and IV Endometriosis.

Deng T, Lin Y, Chen L, Jiang J Int J Gen Med. 2023; 16:4357-4364.

PMID: 37786803 PMC: 10541528. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S429953.


Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates between Flexible and Conventional Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Poor Ovarian Response Patients According to POSEIDON Criteria: A Cohort Study.

Chen Y, Chu Y, Yao W, Wang L, Zeng W, Yue J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(18).

PMID: 37762716 PMC: 10531846. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185775.


A comparative study between Dydrogesterone alone and combined with Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in the treatment of Mild Endometriosis.

Xue H, Hao W, Wang B Pak J Med Sci. 2023; 39(5):1406-1410.

PMID: 37680832 PMC: 10480722. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.39.5.7138.


Impact of dienogest pretreatment on IVF-ET outcomes in patients with endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shao W, Li Y, Wang Y J Ovarian Res. 2023; 16(1):166.

PMID: 37587520 PMC: 10428538. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01245-8.


Chlormadinone acetate in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation does not negatively affect clinical results.

Shibasaki S, Hattori H, Koizumi M, Nagaura S, Toya M, Igarashi H Reprod Med Biol. 2023; 22(1):e12519.

PMID: 37265782 PMC: 10231652. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12519.