Radical Cystectomy Against Intravesical BCG for High-Risk High-Grade Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Results From the Randomized Controlled BRAVO-Feasibility Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: High-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (HRNMIBC) is a heterogeneous disease. Treatments include intravesical maintenance (mBCG) and radical cystectomy (RC). We wanted to understand whether a randomized trial comparing these options was possible.
Materials And Methods: We conducted a two-arm, prospective multicenter randomized study to determine the feasibility in -naive patients. Participants had new high-risk HRNMIBC suitable for both treatments. Random assignment was stratified by age, sex, center, stage, presence of carcinoma in situ, and prior low-risk bladder cancer. Qualitative work investigated how to maintain equipoise. The primary outcome was the number of patients screened, eligible, recruited, and randomly assigned.
Results: We screened 407 patients, approached 185, and obtained consent from 51 (27.6%) patients. Of these, one did not proceed and therefore 50 were randomly assigned (1:1). In the mBCG arm, 23/25 (92.0%) patients received mBCG, four had nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after induction, three had NMIBC at 4 months, and four received RC. At closure, two patients had metastatic BC. In the RC arm, 20 (80.0%) participants received cystectomy, including five (25.0%) with no tumor, 13 (65.0%) with HRNMIBC, and two (10.0%) with muscle invasion in their specimen. At follow-up, all patients in the RC arm were free of disease. Adverse events were mostly mild and equally distributed (15/23 [65.2%] patients with mBCG and 13/20 [65.0%] patients with RC). The quality of life (QOL) of both arms was broadly similar at 12 months.
Conclusion: A randomized controlled trial comparing mBCG and RC will be challenging to recruit into. Around 10% of patients with high-risk HRNMIBC have a lethal disease and may be better treated by primary radical treatment. Conversely, many are suitable for bladder preservation and may maintain their prediagnosis QOL.
Apolo A, Baumann B, Al-Ahmadie H, Ballas L, Bangs R, Brothers K Bladder Cancer. 2025; 11(1):23523735251319185.
PMID: 40034245 PMC: 11863732. DOI: 10.1177/23523735251319185.
Smani S, DuBois J, Zhao K, Sutherland R, Rahman S, Humphrey P Curr Oncol Rep. 2025; .
PMID: 39976835 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-025-01645-7.
Unsworth-White S, Humayun-Zakaria N, Bryan R Transl Androl Urol. 2025; 14(1):1-3.
PMID: 39974809 PMC: 11833534. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-529.
Mair M, Leibetseder A, Heller G, Tomasich E, Muller L, Busse I J Neurol. 2025; 272(3):210.
PMID: 39954095 PMC: 11829921. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-025-12923-6.
Liquid Biopsy and Multidisciplinary Treatment for Esophageal Cancer.
Hoshi Y, Matsuda S, Takeuchi M, Kawakubo H, Kitagawa Y Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).
PMID: 39857978 PMC: 11763614. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020196.