» Articles » PMID: 33332016

Sex Differences in Adaptations in Muscle Strength and Size Following Resistance Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2020 Dec 17
PMID 33332016
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Reductions in muscle size and strength occur with aging. These changes can be mitigated by participation in resistance training. At present, it is unknown if sex contributes to differences in adaptation to resistance training in older adults.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to determine if sex differences are apparent in adaptations to resistance training in older adults.

Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Data Sources: Web of Science; Science Direct; SPORTDiscus; CINAHL; and MEDLINE were searched from inception to June 2020.

Eligibility Criteria: Studies where males and females older than 50 years of age performed identical resistance training interventions and had outcome measures of muscle strength or size.

Results: We initially screened 5337 studies. 30 studies (with 41 comparison groups) were included in our review (1410 participants; 651 males, 759 females). Mean study quality was 14.7/29 on a modified Downs and Black checklist, considered moderate quality. Females gained more relative lower-body strength than males (g = - 0.21 [95% CI - 0.33, - 0.10], p = 0.0003) but there were no differences in relative change for upper-body strength (g = - 0.29 [95% CI - 0.62, 0.04], p = 0.08) or relative muscle size (g = 0.10 [95% CI - 0.04, 0.23], p = 0.16). Males gained more absolute upper-body strength (g = 0.48 [95% CI 0.09, 0.88], p = 0.016), absolute lower-body strength (g = 0.33 [95% CI 0.19, 0.47], p < 0.0001), and absolute muscle size (g = 0.45 [95% CI 0.23, 0.66], p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Our results indicate that sex differences in adaptations to resistance training are apparent in older adults. However, it is evident that the interpretation of sex-dependent adaptations to resistance training is heavily influenced by the presentation of the results in either an absolute or relative context.

Study Registration: Open Science Framework (osf.io/afn3y/).

Citing Articles

Sex differences in absolute and relative changes in muscle size following resistance training in healthy adults: a systematic review with Bayesian meta-analysis.

Refalo M, Nuckols G, Galpin A, Gallagher I, Hamilton D, Fyfe J PeerJ. 2025; 13:e19042.

PMID: 40028215 PMC: 11869894. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.19042.


Enhancing physical fitness using recreational soccer and basketball: A parallel-controlled 8-week study involving overweight and obese individuals, with consideration of sex-related interactions.

Xu Q, Silva R, Zmijewski P, Li T, Li J, Yang L Biol Sport. 2025; 42(1):47-58.

PMID: 39758168 PMC: 11694193. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2025.139081.


Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR).

Izquierdo M, De Souto Barreto P, Arai H, Bischoff-Ferrari H, Cadore E, Cesari M J Nutr Health Aging. 2025; 29(1):100401.

PMID: 39743381 PMC: 11812118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100401.


The effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on muscle strength and pain in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Wang Q, Ong M, Man G, Franco-Obregon A, Choi B, Lui P Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1435277.

PMID: 39478814 PMC: 11521844. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1435277.


Sex differences in the adaptations in maximal strength and anaerobic power to upper body plyometric training.

Lu G, Duan Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21304.

PMID: 39266662 PMC: 11393314. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-72234-0.


References
1.
Frontera W, Hughes V, Fielding R, Fiatarone M, Evans W, Roubenoff R . Aging of skeletal muscle: a 12-yr longitudinal study. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000; 88(4):1321-6. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.4.1321. View

2.
Fielding R, Vellas B, Evans W, Bhasin S, Morley J, Newman A . Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011; 12(4):249-56. PMC: 3377163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.003. View

3.
Chen L, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T, Chou M, Iijima K . Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020; 21(3):300-307.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. View

4.
Chumlea W, Cesari M, Evans W, Ferrucci L, Fielding R, Pahor M . Sarcopenia: designing phase IIB trials. J Nutr Health Aging. 2011; 15(6):450-5. PMC: 3367322. DOI: 10.1007/s12603-011-0092-7. View

5.
Senior H, Henwood T, Beller E, Mitchell G, Keogh J . Prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia among adults living in nursing homes. Maturitas. 2015; 82(4):418-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.08.006. View