» Articles » PMID: 33329678

Regulation and Subfunctionalization of Flowering Time Genes in the Allotetraploid Oil Crop

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2020 Dec 17
PMID 33329678
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Flowering is a vulnerable, but crucial phase in building crop yield. Proper timing of this period is therefore decisive in obtaining optimal yields. However, genetic regulation of flowering integrates many different environmental signals and is therefore extremely complex. This complexity increases in polyploid crops which carry two or more chromosome sets, like wheat, potato or rapeseed. Here, I summarize the current state of knowledge about flowering time gene copies in rapeseed (), an important oil crop with a complex polyploid history and a close relationship to . The current data show a high demand for more targeted studies on flowering time genes in crops rather than in models, allowing better breeding designs and a deeper understanding of evolutionary principles. Over evolutionary time, some copies of rapeseed flowering time genes changed or lost their original role, resulting in subfunctionalization of the respective homologs. For useful applications in breeding, such patterns of subfunctionalization need to be identified and better understood.

Citing Articles

Transgressive expression and dosage effect of A09 chromosome genes and their homoeologous genes influence the flowering time of resynthesized allopolyploid Brassica napus.

Bai Y, Zhao K, Wang B, Wu L, Xiong Z BMC Plant Biol. 2025; 25(1):226.

PMID: 39972272 PMC: 11837392. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-025-06236-z.


Morphological, Physiological, and Molecular Responses to Heat Stress in Brassicaceae.

Batool I, Ayyaz A, Qin T, Wu X, Chen W, Hannan F Plants (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39861509 PMC: 11768255. DOI: 10.3390/plants14020152.


The story of a decade: Genomics, functional genomics, and molecular breeding in Brassica napus.

Gu J, Guan Z, Jiao Y, Liu K, Hong D Plant Commun. 2024; 5(4):100884.

PMID: 38494786 PMC: 11009362. DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.100884.


Flowering time: From physiology, through genetics to mechanism.

Maple R, Zhu P, Hepworth J, Wang J, Dean C Plant Physiol. 2024; 195(1):190-212.

PMID: 38417841 PMC: 11060688. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiae109.


Exploring silique number in Brassica napus L.: Genetic and molecular advances for improving yield.

Wang H, Li X, Meng B, Fan Y, Khan S, Qian M Plant Biotechnol J. 2024; 22(7):1897-1912.

PMID: 38386569 PMC: 11182599. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.14309.


References
1.
Raman H, Raman R, Qiu Y, Yadav A, Sureshkumar S, Borg L . GWAS hints at pleiotropic roles for FLOWERING LOCUS T in flowering time and yield-related traits in canola. BMC Genomics. 2019; 20(1):636. PMC: 6685183. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5964-y. View

2.
Yu S, Galvao V, Zhang Y, Horrer D, Zhang T, Hao Y . Gibberellin regulates the Arabidopsis floral transition through miR156-targeted SQUAMOSA promoter binding-like transcription factors. Plant Cell. 2012; 24(8):3320-32. PMC: 3462634. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.112.101014. View

3.
Wang J, Hopkins C, Hou J, Zou X, Wang C, Long Y . Promoter variation and transcript divergence in Brassicaceae lineages of FLOWERING LOCUS T. PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e47127. PMC: 3469537. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047127. View

4.
Kittipol V, He Z, Wang L, Doheny-Adams T, Langer S, Bancroft I . Genetic architecture of glucosinolate variation in Brassica napus. J Plant Physiol. 2019; 240:152988. PMC: 6739596. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2019.06.001. View

5.
Schiessl S, Williams N, Specht P, Staiger D, Johansson M . Different copies of SENSITIVITY TO RED LIGHT REDUCED 1 show strong subfunctionalization in Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2019; 19(1):372. PMC: 6704554. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-1973-x. View