» Articles » PMID: 33327708

Auditory Recognition of Digit-in-Noise Under Unaided and Aided Conditions in Moderate and Severe Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Overview
Journal J Audiol Otol
Date 2020 Dec 17
PMID 33327708
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: The speech-in-noise test is typically performed using an audiometer. The results of the digit-in-noise recognition (DIN) test may be influenced by the flat frequency response of free-field audiometry and frequency of the hearing aid fit based on fitting rationale. This study aims to investigate the DIN test in unaided and aided conditions.

Subjects And Methods: Thirty four adults with moderate and severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) participated in the study. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for 50% of the DIN test was obtained in the following two conditions: 1) the unaided condition, performed using an audiometer in a free field; and 2) aided condition, performed using a hearing aid with an unvented individual earmold that was fitted based on NAL-NL2.

Results: There was a statistically significant elevation in the mean SNR for the severe SNHL group in both test conditions when compared with that of the moderate SNHL group. In both groups, the SNR for the aided condition was significantly lower than that of the unaided condition.

Conclusions: Speech recognition in hearing-impaired patients can be realized by fitting hearing aids based on evidence-based fitting rationale rather than by measuring it using free-field audiometry measurement that is utilized in a routine clinic setup.

Citing Articles

Analysis of the Spanish Auditory Test of Speech in Noise (PAHRE) in a Population with Hearing Loss.

Rodriguez-Ferreiro M, Duran-Bouza M, Marrero-Aguiar V Audiol Res. 2024; 14(5):861-874.

PMID: 39452465 PMC: 11505354. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres14050073.

References
1.
Ahmadi R, Jalilvand H, Mahdavi M, Ahmadi F, Baghban A . The Effects of Hearing Aid Digital Noise Reduction and Directionality on Acceptable Noise Level. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018; 11(4):267-274. PMC: 6222189. DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2018.00052. View

2.
Scollie S, Glista D, Tenhaaf J, Dunn A, Malandrino A, Keene K . Stimuli and normative data for detection of Ling-6 sounds in hearing level. Am J Audiol. 2012; 21(2):232-41. DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0020). View

3.
Jansen S, Luts H, Dejonckere P, van Wieringen A, Wouters J . Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the digit triplet test. Ear Hear. 2013; 34(6):773-8. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318297920b. View

4.
Houtgast T, Festen J . On the auditory and cognitive functions that may explain an individual's elevation of the speech reception threshold in noise. Int J Audiol. 2008; 47(6):287-95. DOI: 10.1080/14992020802127109. View

5.
Smits C, Kapteyn T, Houtgast T . Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol. 2004; 43(1):15-28. DOI: 10.1080/14992020400050004. View