» Articles » PMID: 33324705

Tilapia On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Semi-intensive Production Systems

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2020 Dec 16
PMID 33324705
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and test a tilapia on-farm welfare assessment protocol, based on Brazilian semi-intensive production systems. The study included two mains steps: the elaboration of tilapia welfare protocol and its on-field feasibility test. The protocol, including the potential indicators organized into health, environmental, nutritional, and behavioral categories, was tested on three farms. Skin, eyes, gills, jaws, fins, and vertebral spine were individually examined in 139 individual tilapias. Water physicochemical parameters and production system were considered. The overall nutritional status of individuals was assessed through body condition factor, feed conversion ratio, feed crude protein ratio, and feed ingestion behavior. During massive capture, signals of stress, level of crowding, and duration of air exposure were registered. Time required for loss of consciousness was evaluated by clinical reflexes and other behaviors during slaughter. Eye, jaw, and gill scores were different across farms (Kruskal-Wallis test, = 0.011; 0.015; 0.043, respectively), showing good discrimination power. Critical welfare points were extremely low dissolved oxygen in water, fin and skin lesions, prolonged air exposure during pre-slaughter handling and non-humane slaughter techniques, as decapitation or asphyxia. The protocol presents practical viability and it is an initial step for the development of a tilapia welfare strategy, where the prioritization of critical welfare points, implementation of corrective actions and monitoring of the results is part of a permanent welfare management system.

Citing Articles

A New Cell Line from the Brain of Red Hybrid Tilapia ( spp.) for Tilapia Lake Virus Propagation.

Mohamad A, Khemthong M, Trongwongsa P, Lertwanakarn T, Setthawong P, Surachetpong W Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38891569 PMC: 11171066. DOI: 10.3390/ani14111522.


Estimating global numbers of farmed fishes killed for food annually from 1990 to 2019.

Mood A, Lara E, Boyland N, Brooke P Anim Welf. 2024; 32:e12.

PMID: 38487450 PMC: 10936281. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2023.4.


From egg to slaughter: monitoring the welfare of Nile tilapia, , throughout their entire life cycle in aquaculture.

Pedrazzani A, Cozer N, Quintiliano M, Tavares C, Biernaski V, Ostrensky A Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1268396.

PMID: 37808101 PMC: 10551173. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1268396.


Assessment of Tilapia ( spp.) Welfare in the Semi-Intensive and Intensive Culture Systems in Thailand.

Lertwanakarn T, Purimayata T, Luengyosluechakul T, Grimalt P, Pedrazzani A, Quintiliano M Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(15).

PMID: 37570306 PMC: 10416865. DOI: 10.3390/ani13152498.


Non-Invasive Methods for Assessing the Welfare of Farmed White-Leg Shrimp ().

Pedrazzani A, Cozer N, Quintiliano M, Tavares C, da Silva U, Ostrensky A Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 36899664 PMC: 10000178. DOI: 10.3390/ani13050807.


References
1.
Lines J, Spence J . Safeguarding the welfare of farmed fish at harvest. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2011; 38(1):153-62. DOI: 10.1007/s10695-011-9561-5. View

2.
Martins C, Galhardo L, Noble C, Damsgard B, Spedicato M, Zupa W . Behavioural indicators of welfare in farmed fish. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2011; 38(1):17-41. PMC: 3276765. DOI: 10.1007/s10695-011-9518-8. View

3.
Noble C, Jones H, Damsgard B, Flood M, Midling K, Roque A . Injuries and deformities in fish: their potential impacts upon aquacultural production and welfare. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2011; 38(1):61-83. DOI: 10.1007/s10695-011-9557-1. View

4.
Wicks B, Randall D . The effect of feeding and fasting on ammonia toxicity in juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquat Toxicol. 2002; 59(1-2):71-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-445x(01)00237-5. View

5.
Jurk I . Ophthalmic disease of fish. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2002; 5(2):243-60, v. DOI: 10.1016/s1094-9194(02)00006-3. View