» Articles » PMID: 33318690

Strengthening the Evidence Base for Temperature-mediated Phenological Asynchrony and Its Impacts

Abstract

Climate warming has caused the seasonal timing of many components of ecological food chains to advance. In the context of trophic interactions, the match-mismatch hypothesis postulates that differential shifts can lead to phenological asynchrony with negative impacts for consumers. However, at present there has been no consistent analysis of the links between temperature change, phenological asynchrony and individual-to-population-level impacts across taxa, trophic levels and biomes at a global scale. Here, we propose five criteria that all need to be met to demonstrate that temperature-mediated trophic asynchrony poses a growing risk to consumers. We conduct a literature review of 109 papers studying 129 taxa, and find that all five criteria are assessed for only two taxa, with the majority of taxa only having one or two criteria assessed. Crucially, nearly every study was conducted in Europe or North America, and most studies were on terrestrial secondary consumers. We thus lack a robust evidence base from which to draw general conclusions about the risk that climate-mediated trophic asynchrony may pose to populations worldwide.

Citing Articles

Individual plasticity in response to rising sea temperatures contributes to an advancement in green turtle nesting phenology.

Rickwood M, Tucker E, Beton D, Davey S, Godley B, Snape R Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2041):20241809.

PMID: 39968614 PMC: 11836697. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1809.


Phenological divergence between plants and animals under climate change.

Lang W, Zhang Y, Li X, Meng F, Liu Q, Wang K Nat Ecol Evol. 2024; 9(2):261-272.

PMID: 39653762 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02597-0.


Trophic generalism in the winter moth: a model species for phenological mismatch.

Weir J Oecologia. 2024; 206(3-4):225-239.

PMID: 39562339 PMC: 11599306. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-024-05629-5.


Space-for-time substitutions exaggerate urban bird-habitat ecological relationships.

Eyster H, Chan K, Fletcher M, Beckage B J Anim Ecol. 2024; 93(12):1854-1867.

PMID: 39506196 PMC: 11615266. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.14194.


Spatial match-mismatch between predators and prey under climate change.

Carroll G, Abrahms B, Brodie S, Cimino M Nat Ecol Evol. 2024; 8(9):1593-1601.

PMID: 38914712 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02454-0.


References
1.
Walther G, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee T . Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 2002; 416(6879):389-95. DOI: 10.1038/416389a. View

2.
Parmesan C, Yohe G . A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature. 2003; 421(6918):37-42. DOI: 10.1038/nature01286. View

3.
Walther G . Community and ecosystem responses to recent climate change. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010; 365(1549):2019-24. PMC: 2880129. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0021. View

4.
Daufresne M, Lengfellner K, Sommer U . Global warming benefits the small in aquatic ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(31):12788-93. PMC: 2722360. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0902080106. View

5.
Thackeray S, Henrys P, Hemming D, Bell J, Botham M, Burthe S . Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels. Nature. 2016; 535(7611):241-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature18608. View