» Articles » PMID: 33318521

CoMix: Comparing Mixing Patterns in the Belgian Population During and After Lockdown

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Dec 15
PMID 33318521
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has shown how a newly emergent communicable disease can lay considerable burden on public health. To avoid system collapse, governments have resorted to several social distancing measures. In Belgium, this included a lockdown and a following period of phased re-opening. A representative sample of Belgian adults was asked about their contact behaviour from mid-April to the beginning of August, during different stages of the intervention measures in Belgium. Use of personal protection equipment (face masks) and compliance to hygienic measures was also reported. We estimated the expected reproduction number computing the ratio of [Formula: see text] with respect to pre-pandemic data. During the first two waves (the first month) of the survey, the reduction in the average number of contacts was around 80% and was quite consistent across all age-classes. The average number of contacts increased over time, particularly for the younger age classes, still remaining significantly lower than pre-pandemic values. From the end of May to the end of July , the estimated reproduction number has a median value larger than one, although with a wide dispersion. Estimated [Formula: see text] fell below one again at the beginning of August. We have shown how a rapidly deployed survey can measure compliance to social distancing and assess its impact on COVID-19 spread. Monitoring the effectiveness of social distancing recommendations is of paramount importance to avoid further waves of COVID-19.

Citing Articles

Assessing the role of children in the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium using perturbation analysis.

Angeli L, Caetano C, Franco N, Coletti P, Faes C, Molenberghs G Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2230.

PMID: 40044649 PMC: 11882900. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57087-z.


Social contact patterns in South Korea: an analysis of a survey conducted in 2023-2024.

Son W, Chae M, Hwang D, Nah K, Kim M, Kim J BMC Infect Dis. 2025; 25(1):295.

PMID: 40025440 PMC: 11871801. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-025-10706-y.


Identifying the main drivers of transmission in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal.

Caetano C, Angeli L, Varela-Lasheras I, Coletti P, Morgado L, Lima P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30689.

PMID: 39730359 PMC: 11680834. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76604-6.


Towards pandemic preparedness: ability to estimate high-resolution social contact patterns from longitudinal surveys.

Dan S, Tegegne J, Chen Y, Ling Z, Jaeger V, Karch A Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39711531 PMC: 11661306. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5182601/v1.


Contact behaviour before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: evidence from contact surveys, 2016 to 2017 and 2020 to 2023.

Backer J, Vos E, Den Hartog G, van Hagen C, de Melker H, van der Klis F Euro Surveill. 2024; 29(43).

PMID: 39450517 PMC: 11513762. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.43.2400143.


References
1.
Hoang T, Coletti P, Melegaro A, Wallinga J, Grijalva C, Edmunds J . A Systematic Review of Social Contact Surveys to Inform Transmission Models of Close-contact Infections. Epidemiology. 2019; 30(5):723-736. PMC: 6684224. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001047. View

2.
Mastrandrea R, Fournet J, Barrat A . Contact Patterns in a High School: A Comparison between Data Collected Using Wearable Sensors, Contact Diaries and Friendship Surveys. PLoS One. 2015; 10(9):e0136497. PMC: 4556655. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136497. View

3.
Van Bavel J, Baicker K, Boggio P, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M . Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020; 4(5):460-471. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. View

4.
Backer J, Mollema L, Vos E, Klinkenberg D, van der Klis F, de Melker H . Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016-17, April 2020 and June 2020. Euro Surveill. 2021; 26(8). PMC: 7908067. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.8.2000994. View

5.
Hens N, Ayele G, Goeyvaerts N, Aerts M, Mossong J, Edmunds J . Estimating the impact of school closure on social mixing behaviour and the transmission of close contact infections in eight European countries. BMC Infect Dis. 2009; 9:187. PMC: 2799408. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-187. View