» Articles » PMID: 33316501

An Emerging Source of Plastic Pollution: Environmental Presence of Plastic Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Debris Related to COVID-19 in a Metropolitan City

Overview
Journal Environ Pollut
Date 2020 Dec 14
PMID 33316501
Citations 95
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented surge of production, consumption, and disposal of personal protective equipment (PPE) including face masks, disposable gloves, and disinfectant wipes, which are often made of single use plastic. Widespread public use of these items has imposed pressure on municipalities to properly collect and dispose of potentially infectious PPE. There has been a lack of structured monitoring efforts to quantify the emerging trend of improperly disposed of PPE debris. In this study, we present a baseline monitoring survey to describe the spatial distribution of PPE debris during the COVID-19 pandemic from the metropolitan city of Toronto, Canada. Our objectives were to: (1) quantify PPE debris types among surveyed areas and; (2) identify PPE debris densities and accumulation of surveyed areas. A total of 1306 PPE debris items were documented, with the majority being disposable gloves (44%), followed by face masks (31%), and disinfecting wipes (25%). Of the face masks, 97% were designed for single use while only 3% were reusable. Of the surveyed locations, the highest daily average densities of PPE debris were recorded in the large and medium-sized grocery store parking lots and the hospital district (0.00475 items/m, 0.00160 items/m, and 0.00133 items/m respectively). The two surveyed residential areas had the following highest PPE densities (0.00029 items/m and 0.00027 items/m), while the recreational trail had the lowest densities (0.00020 items/m). Assuming a business-as-usual accumulation, an estimated 14,298 PPE items will be leaked as debris in just the surveyed areas annually. To facilitate proper disposal of PPE debris by the public we recommend development of municipal efforts to improve PPE collection methods that are informed by the described PPE waste pathways.

Citing Articles

Biobased Compostable Plastics End-of-Life: Environmental Assessment Including Carbon Footprint and Microplastic Impacts.

Keyes A, Saffron C, Manjure S, Narayan R Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(21).

PMID: 39518282 PMC: 11548190. DOI: 10.3390/polym16213073.


Inter-observer reliability in transect-based observations of environmental waste in greater accra and kisumu: implications for waste management.

Okotto-Okotto J, Dzodzomenyo M, Okotto L, Shaw P, Damkjaer S, Myers-Hansen G Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran). 2024; 21(15):9409-9424.

PMID: 39421609 PMC: 11480156. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-024-05625-5.


Wet wipes contribution to microfiber contamination under COVID-19 era: An important but overlooked problem.

Shruti V, Perez-Guevara F, Kutralam-Muniasamy G Environ Chall (Amst). 2024; 5:100267.

PMID: 38620870 PMC: 8411576. DOI: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100267.


Advance Analysis of the Obtained Recycled Materials from Used Disposable Surgical Masks.

Erjavec A, Volmajer Valh J, Hribernik S, Krasevac Glaser T, Zemljic L, Vuherer T Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(7).

PMID: 38611193 PMC: 11013069. DOI: 10.3390/polym16070935.


Harnessing photosynthetic microorganisms for enhanced bioremediation of microplastics: A comprehensive review.

Barone G, Rodriguez-Seijo A, Parati M, Johnston B, Erdem E, Cernava T Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2024; 20:100407.

PMID: 38544950 PMC: 10965471. DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2024.100407.


References
1.
Fadare O, Okoffo E . Covid-19 face masks: A potential source of microplastic fibers in the environment. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 737:140279. PMC: 7297173. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140279. View

2.
Dolez P, Gauvin C, Lara J, Vu-Khanh T . Effect of protective glove exposure to industrial contaminants on their resistance to mechanical risks. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2010; 16(2):169-83. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2010.11076837. View

3.
Hoellein T, Rojas M, Pink A, Gasior J, Kelly J . Anthropogenic litter in urban freshwater ecosystems: distribution and microbial interactions. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e98485. PMC: 4067278. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098485. View

4.
Nelms S, Eyles L, Godley B, Richardson P, Selley H, Solandt J . Investigating the distribution and regional occurrence of anthropogenic litter in English marine protected areas using 25 years of citizen-science beach clean data. Environ Pollut. 2020; 263(Pt B):114365. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114365. View

5.
McCleery R, Fletcher Jr R, Kruger L, Govender D, Ferreira S . Conservation needs a COVID-19 bailout. Science. 2020; 369(6503):515-516. DOI: 10.1126/science.abd2854. View