» Articles » PMID: 33312653

Size Distribution of Microbial Aerosols in Overground and Subterranean Treatment Chambers at Health Resorts

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Dec 14
PMID 33312653
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: to perform comparative analyzes of the size distributions of bacteria and fungi in the air of overground therapy chambers in Szczawnica sanatorium and subterranean inhalation chambers in Bochnia Salt Mine health resort taking into account influence of the season and presence of pathogenic species.

Methods: bioaerosol samples were collected using 6-stage Andersen impactor. Bacterial and fungal aerosol concentrations and size distributions were calculated and isolated microorganisms were taxonomically identified based on their morphological, biochemical, and molecular features. Results: in both treatment rooms and atmospheric (outdoor) air, the acceptable microbial pollution levels were periodically exceeded. The size distribution analyzes revealed that in the case of bacteria - emission from the patients and in the case of fungi - transport with atmospheric (outdoor) air were the major processes responsible for microbiological contamination of indoor premises. The majority of microbial particulates were present in the air of studied premises as single bacterial vegetative cells, spores and fungal conidia or (most commonly) formed small microbial or microbial-dust aggregates. This phenomenon may have a significant effect on patients' actual exposure (especially on those treated for respiratory diseases) in terms of the dose of inhaled particles.

Conclusions: the microbiological quality of the air in sanatoriums and health resorts is a key factor for their therapeutic and prophylactic functions. When microbial pollution crossed the acceptable level, the measures that enable reducing undesirable contamination should be introduced, especially if large groups of patients undergo such therapy.

Citing Articles

Advances in Electrostatic Plasma Methods for Purification of Airborne Pathogenic Microbial Aerosols: Mechanism, Modeling and Application.

Tao S, Zhu Y, Chen M, Shangguan W Environ Health (Wash). 2024; 2(9):596-617.

PMID: 39512392 PMC: 11540111. DOI: 10.1021/envhealth.4c00100.


Comparison of Culture-Dependent and Culture-Independent Methods for Routine Identification of Airborne Microorganisms in Speleotherapeutic Caves.

Tomazin R, Cerar Kisek T, Janko T, Triglav T, Strasek Smrdel K, Cvitkovic Spik V Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39065195 PMC: 11278542. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12071427.


Halophilic Archaea and Activate Human Dendritic Cells and Orient T Helper Cell Responses.

Krawczyk K, Locht C, Kowalewicz-Kulbat M Front Immunol. 2022; 13:833635.

PMID: 35720372 PMC: 9204267. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.833635.

References
1.
Gebarowska E, Pusz W, Kucinska J, Kita W . Comparative analysis of airborne bacteria and fungi in two salt mines in Poland. Aerobiologia (Bologna). 2018; 34(2):127-138. PMC: 5945750. DOI: 10.1007/s10453-017-9502-6. View

2.
Prussin 2nd A, Marr L . Sources of airborne microorganisms in the built environment. Microbiome. 2015; 3:78. PMC: 4688924. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-015-0144-z. View

3.
Bosshard P, Zbinden R, Abels S, Boddinghaus B, Altwegg M, Bottger E . 16S rRNA gene sequencing versus the API 20 NE system and the VITEK 2 ID-GNB card for identification of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria in the clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(4):1359-66. PMC: 1448638. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1359-1366.2006. View

4.
Tsay M, Tseng C, Wu N, Lai C . Size distribution and antibiotic-resistant characteristics of bacterial bioaerosol in intensive care unit before and during visits to patients. Environ Int. 2020; 144:106024. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106024. View

5.
Gorny R, Dutkiewicz J, Krysinska-Traczyk E . Size distribution of bacterial and fungal bioaerosols in indoor air. Ann Agric Environ Med. 1999; 6(2):105-113. View