Computed Tomography Evaluation of Fat Infiltration Ratio of the Multifidus Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

Overview

Journal Eur J Radiol Open

Specialty Radiology

Date 2020 Dec 11

PMID 33304941

Citations 9

Authors

Marcel Prasetyo

Nadia Nindita

I Nyoman Murdana

Joedo Prihartono

Stefanus Imanuel Setiawan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Objectives: Fat infiltration of multifidus muscle is an important parameter to assess the efficacy of spinal stabilization training in chronic low back pain (LBP) patients. As a CT scan shows a specific attenuation value for fat, it can be used as a ratio to evaluate fat infiltration of the muscle relative to its cross-sectional area. This study aims to compare the fat infiltration ratio of multifidus muscle between subjects with and without chronic LBP in Indonesia.

Methods: Comparative cross-sectional study of 20 subjects with chronic LBP and 20 subjects without LBP. Fat infiltration ratio calculation of the multifidus muscle was obtained from the database of abdominal CT at the level of the superior and inferior endplate of L4 and L5 vertebral body.

Results: The fat infiltration ratio of multifidus muscle in the chronic LBP subjects group was significantly higher than the subjects group without NPB (p < 0.05). The cut-off value of the fat infiltration ratio at the level of the inferior endplate of L4 was 0.125 (75 % sensitivity and 80 % specificity).

Conclusion: The calculation of the multifidus muscle fat infiltration ratio at the inferior endplate L4 using CT is a potential method to evaluate multifidus muscle quality in chronic LBP patients.

Citing Articles

The role of paraspinal muscle degeneration in cervical spondylosis.

Li Z, Zhang Y, Lin Y, Fan C, Yang Y, Sun Y Eur Spine J. 2025; 34(3):1187-1197.

PMID: 39812789 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08648-9.

Quantification of volumetric thigh and paravertebral muscle fat content: comparison of quantitative Dixon (Q-Dixon) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with high-speed T-corrected multiecho MR spectroscopy.

Zhang W, Fu C, Yan D, Yuan Y, Zhang W, Gu D Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(7):4490-4505.

PMID: 39022270 PMC: 11250322. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-127.

Inter-software and inter-threshold reliability of quantitative paraspinal muscle segmentation.

Liu S, Schmidt H, Ziegeler K, Zhang T, Yang D, Taheri N Eur Spine J. 2023; 33(2):369-378.

PMID: 38055039 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08050-3.

Risk Factors in Patients with Low Back Pain Under 40 Years Old: Quantitative Analysis Based on Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging mDIXON-Quant.

Fan Z, Wang T, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Wu T, Liu D J Pain Res. 2023; 16:3417-3431.

PMID: 37841453 PMC: 10573373. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S426488.

Fatty Degeneration of the Autochthonous Muscles Is Significantly Associated with Incidental Non-Traumatic Vertebral Body Fractures of the Lower Thoracic Spine in Elderly Patients.

Backhauss J, Jansen O, Kauczor H, Sedaghat S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(14).

PMID: 37510680 PMC: 10380814. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144565.

References

Niemelainen R, Briand M, Battie M . Substantial asymmetry in paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area in healthy adults questions its value as a marker of low back pain and pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(25):2152-7. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318204b05a. View

Kamaz M, Kiresi D, Oguz H, Emlik D, Levendoglu F . CT measurement of trunk muscle areas in patients with chronic low back pain. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2007; 13(3):144-8. View

Christner J, Kofler J, McCollough C . Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194(4):881-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3462. View

Phoenix J, Betal D, Roberts N, Helliwell T, EDWARDS R . Objective quantification of muscle and fat in human dystrophic muscle by magnetic resonance image analysis. Muscle Nerve. 1996; 19(3):302-10. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199603)19:3<302::AID-MUS4>3.0.CO;2-H. View

Mengiardi B, Schmid M, Boos N, Pfirrmann C, Brunner F, Elfering A . Fat content of lumbar paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and in asymptomatic volunteers: quantification with MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2006; 240(3):786-92. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2403050820. View

Freeman M, Woodham M, Woodham A . The role of the lumbar multifidus in chronic low back pain: a review. PM R. 2010; 2(2):142-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.11.006. View

Crawford R, Filli L, Elliott J, Nanz D, Fischer M, Marcon M . Age- and Level-Dependence of Fatty Infiltration in Lumbar Paravertebral Muscles of Healthy Volunteers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 37(4):742-8. PMC: 7960169. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4596. View

Hu Z, He J, Zhao F, Fang X, Zhou L, Fan S . An assessment of the intra- and inter-reliability of the lumbar paraspinal muscle parameters using CT scan and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(13):E868-74. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ef6b51. View

Kim S, Kim H, Chung J . Effects of Spinal Stabilization Exercise on the Cross-sectional Areas of the Lumbar Multifidus and Psoas Major Muscles, Pain Intensity, and Lumbar Muscle Strength of Patients with Degenerative Disc Disease. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014; 26(4):579-82. PMC: 3996425. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.26.579. View

10.

Keller A, Gunderson R, Reikeras O, Brox J . Reliability of computed tomography measurements of paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area and density in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(13):1455-60. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067094.55003.AD. View

11.

Battie M, Niemelainen R, Gibbons L, Dhillon S . Is level- and side-specific multifidus asymmetry a marker for lumbar disc pathology?. Spine J. 2012; 12(10):932-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.020. View

12.

Battaglia P, Maeda Y, Welk A, Hough B, Kettner N . Reliability of the Goutallier classification in quantifying muscle fatty degeneration in the lumbar multifidus using magnetic resonance imaging. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014; 37(3):190-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.12.010. View

13.

Dill T . Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging: non-invasive imaging. Heart. 2008; 94(7):943-8. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.125039. View

14.

Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C . The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73(6):968-74. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. View

15.

Crawford R, Cornwall J, Abbott R, Elliott J . Manually defining regions of interest when quantifying paravertebral muscles fatty infiltration from axial magnetic resonance imaging: a proposed method for the lumbar spine with anatomical cross-reference. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1):25. PMC: 5247810. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1378-z. View

16.

Kamath S, Venkatanarasimha N, Walsh M, Hughes P . MRI appearance of muscle denervation. Skeletal Radiol. 2008; 37(5):397-404. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-007-0409-0. View

17.

Ruan X, Gallagher D, Harris T, Albu J, Heymsfield S, Kuznia P . Estimating whole body intermuscular adipose tissue from single cross-sectional magnetic resonance images. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006; 102(2):748-54. PMC: 2758818. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00304.2006. View

18.

Fortin M, Macedo L . Multifidus and paraspinal muscle group cross-sectional areas of patients with low back pain and control patients: a systematic review with a focus on blinding. Phys Ther. 2013; 93(7):873-88. PMC: 3704232. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120457. View

19.

Mettler Jr F, Huda W, Yoshizumi T, Mahesh M . Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008; 248(1):254-63. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2481071451. View

20.

Danneels L, Cools A, Vanderstraeten G, Cambier D, Witvrouw E, Bourgois J . The effects of three different training modalities on the cross-sectional area of the paravertebral muscles. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2002; 11(6):335-41. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2001.110604.x. View