» Articles » PMID: 33304867

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Emergence Agitation and Recovery Quality Among Children Undergoing Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal Front Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2020 Dec 11
PMID 33304867
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Emergence agitation (EA) is one of the most common and intractable postoperative complications among children undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine, an α(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, offers an ideal sedation, reduces preoperative anxiety, and facilitates smooth induction of anesthesia, and it is widely used in pediatric surgery. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for preventing emergence agitation in children after general anesthesia. We comprehensively reviewed PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases to search all randomized controlled trials, published before April 22, 2020, investigating the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in preventing the emergence agitation in children after general anesthesia. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence agitation. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients requiring rescue analgesic, number of patients with postoperative nausea and vomiting, emergence time, extubation time, and time to discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit. We included a total of 33 studies, comprising 2,549 patients in this meta-analysis. Compared with saline, dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the emergence agitation incidence [risk ratio (RR) 0.29; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.37; < 0.00001], incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.3-0.69; = 0.0002), and the requirement of rescue analgesic (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.18-0.44; < 0.00001). Furthermore, children in the dexmedetomidine group experienced a longer emergence time [mean difference (MD) 2.18; 95% CI 0.81-3.56; = 0.002] and extubation time (MD 0.77; 95% CI 0.22-1.31; = 0.006) compared with those in the saline group. However, no significant difference was observed in the time to discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (MD 2.22; 95% CI -2.29-6.74; = 0.33) between the two groups. No significant differences were observed between the effects of dexmedetomidine and other drugs like midazolam, propofol, fentanyl, tramadol, and clonidine in terms of the emergence agitation incidence and other parameters, except for the requirement of rescue analgesic (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.33-0.61; < 0.00001). Dexmedetomidine can prevent emergence agitation, relieves postoperative pain, decreases the requirement of rescue analgesic, and decreases the postoperative nausea and vomiting events.

Citing Articles

Study on the sedative effect and safety of oral midazolam combined with dexmedetomidine nasal drops in children during magnetic resonance imaging examination.

Li Y, Lei R Front Pediatr. 2025; 12():1500277.

PMID: 39834495 PMC: 11743695. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1500277.


Influencing factors and risk prediction model for emergence agitation after general anesthesia for primary liver cancer.

Song S, Lin L, Li L, Han X World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024; 16(7):2194-2201.

PMID: 39087110 PMC: 11287673. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2194.


Comparison between dexmedetomidine and lidocaine for attenuation of cough response during tracheal extubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purohit A, Kumar M, Kumar N, Bindra A, Pathak S, Yadav A Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 68(5):415-425.

PMID: 38764958 PMC: 11100647. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_790_23.


Tracheal extubation under Narcotrend EEG monitoring at different depths of anesthesia after tonsillectomy in children: a prospective randomized controlled study.

An H, Zhang X, Chen L Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1344710.

PMID: 38616816 PMC: 11010685. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1344710.


Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Periprocedural Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Elsaeidy A, Ahmad A, Kohaf N, Aboutaleb A, Kumar D, Elsaeidy K Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024; 28(4):211-227.

PMID: 38214834 PMC: 10940385. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01208-0.


References
1.
Bhadla S, Prajapati D, Louis T, Puri G, Panchal S, Bhuva M . Comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam premedication in pediatric patients undergoing ophthalmic day-care surgeries. Anesth Essays Res. 2015; 7(2):248-56. PMC: 4173525. DOI: 10.4103/0259-1162.118982. View

2.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

3.
Akin A, Bayram A, Esmaoglu A, Tosun Z, Aksu R, Altuntas R . Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012; 22(9):871-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03802.x. View

4.
Tan D, Xia H, Sun S, Wang F . Effect of ancillary drugs on sevoflurane related emergence agitation in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019; 19(1):138. PMC: 6670177. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0810-y. View

5.
Li H, Zhang L, Shi M, Yang S, Li S, Gao S . Impact of Dexmedetomidine on Pediatric Agitation in the Postanesthesia Care Unit. J Perianesth Nurs. 2018; 33(1):53-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.03.005. View