Lewinnek Safe Zone References Are Frequently Misquoted

Overview

Journal Arthroplast Today

Publisher Elsevier

Date 2020 Dec 10

PMID 33299915

Citations 3

Authors

Aonnicha Burapachaisri

Ameer Elbuluk

Edem Abotsi

Jim Pierrepont

Seth A Jerabek

Aaron J Buckland

Jonathan M Vigdorchik

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Optimal acetabular component orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a necessity in achieving a stable implant. Although there has been considerable debate in the literature concerning the safe zone, to date, there has not been any review to determine if these references are consistent with the definition applied by Lewinnek et al. in 1978. Therefore, this article aims to examine the available literature in the PubMed database to determine how often a correct reference to the safe zone as defined by Lewinnek was applied to discussions regarding THA.

Methods: A search for literature in the PubMed database was performed for articles from 1978 to 2019. Search criteria included terms 'Lewinnek,' 'safe zone,' and 'total hip arthroplasty.' Exclusions included abstract-only articles, non-English articles, articles unrelated to THA, and those lacking full content.

Results: A review of literature yielded 147 articles for inclusion. Overall, only 11% (17) cited the Lewinnek article correctly. Forty-five percent (66) of articles referenced measurements in the supine position, 18% (26) referenced other positions, and 37% (55) did not specify. Nineteen percent (28) reported measurements of the acetabular cup orthogonal to the anterior pelvic plane, while 73% (108) did not, and 7% (11) did not specify. Twenty-three percent (34) measured from computed tomography scans instead of other methods.

Conclusions: In the discussion of the safe zone regarding THA, only 11% of articles listed are consistent with the definition established by Lewinnek. This warrants further investigation into a consistent application of the term and its implications for THA implant stability and dislocation rates.

Citing Articles

Polyethylene liner dissociation in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective case-control study on a single implant design.

Pagano S, Plate J, Kappenschneider T, Reinhard J, Scharf M, Maderbacher G J Orthop Traumatol. 2024; 25(1):38.

PMID: 39143399 PMC: 11324622. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00785-z.

Radiographic study of direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty: a 10-15 year follow-up of Chinese patients.

Sang W, Lai P, Xu X, Liu Y, Ma J, Zhu L Arthroplasty. 2024; 6(1):25.

PMID: 38698494 PMC: 11067169. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-024-00249-z.

Association between sagittal spinal alignment and mechanical complications after primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Susanna H, Jussi R, Teemu K, Kati K J Int Med Res. 2022; 50(8):3000605221116976.

PMID: 35971315 PMC: 9386850. DOI: 10.1177/03000605221116976.

References

Trieu J, Hadden A, Sutherland A . Assessment of acetabular version in total hip arthroplasty: an application of Widmer's technique in a regional setting. ANZ J Surg. 2018; 88(6):573-576. DOI: 10.1111/ans.14506. View

Nomura T, Naito M, Nakamura Y, Ida T, Kuroda D, Kobayashi T . An analysis of the best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip replacement on plain radiographs. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(5):597-603. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B.33013. View

Davda K, Smyth N, Cobb J, Hart A . 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements. Acta Orthop. 2015; 86(4):485-90. PMC: 4513605. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1017791. View

M Ecker T, Tannast M, Murphy S . Computed tomography-based surgical navigation for hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 465:100-5. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181591c7d. View

Rojas J, Bautista M, Bonilla G, Amado O, Huerfano E, Monsalvo D . A retrospective study on the relationship between altered native acetabular angle and vertical implant malpositioning. Int Orthop. 2017; 42(4):769-775. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3584-1. View

Khan R, Maor D, Hofmann M, Haebich S . A comparison of a less invasive piriformis-sparing approach versus the standard posterior approach to the hip: A randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(1):43-50. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27001. View

Darrith B, Bell J, Culvern C, Della Valle C . Can the use of an inclinometer improve the positioning of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty?. Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B(7):862-866. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1607.R1. View

Peters F, Greeff R, Goldstein N, Frey C . Improving acetabular cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty by using smartphone technology. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(7):1324-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.014. View

Inoue M, Majima T, Abe S, Nakamura T, Kanno T, Masuda T . Using the transverse acetabular ligament as a landmark for acetabular anteversion: an intra-operative measurement. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013; 21(2):189-94. DOI: 10.1177/230949901302100215. View

10.

Drobniewski M, Borowski A, Krasinska M, Sibinski M, Synder M . Return to Work after Surgical Treatment of Coxarthrosis by Total Cementless Hip Arthroplasty. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2017; 19(4):349-360. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.4644. View

11.

Schweppe M, Seyler T, Plate J, Swenson R, Lang J . Does surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty affect rehabilitation, discharge disposition, and readmission rate?. Surg Technol Int. 2013; 23:219-27. View

12.

Debi R, Slamowicz E, Cohen O, Elbaz A, Lubovsky O, Lakstein D . Acetabular cup orientation and postoperative leg length discrepancy in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty via a direct anterior and anterolateral approaches. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018; 19(1):188. PMC: 5992835. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2097-4. View

13.

Davis E, Schubert M, Wegner M, Haimerl M . A new method of registration in navigated hip arthroplasty without the need to register the anterior pelvic plane. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 30(1):55-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.08.026. View

14.

Oh K, Kim B, Jo M, Ahn B . Which one is more affected by navigation-assisted cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: Anteversion or inclination? A retrospective matched-pair cohort study in Asian physique. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018; 26(2):2309499018780755. DOI: 10.1177/2309499018780755. View

15.

Ohmori T, Kabata T, Maeda T, Kajino Y, Taga T, Hasegawa K . Increase in safe zone area of the acetabular cup using dual mobility cups in THA. Hip Int. 2017; 27(4):361-367. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000466. View

16.

Tamaki T, Oinuma K, Miura Y, Shiratsuchi H . Total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach for fused hips. Hip Int. 2015; 25(6):549-52. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000308. View

17.

Pierrepont J, Hawdon G, Miles B, Connor B, Bare J, Walter L . Variation in functional pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B(2):184-191. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.BJJ-2016-0098.R1. View

18.

Tai S, Munir S, Walter W, Pearce S, Walter W, Zicat B . Squeaking in large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 30(2):282-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.010. View

19.

Meftah M, Yadav A, Wong A, Ranawat A, Ranawat C . A novel method for accurate and reproducible functional cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(7):1200-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.018. View

20.

El Bitar Y, Jackson T, Lindner D, Botser I, Stake C, Domb B . Predictive value of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2015; 38(1):e31-7. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150105-57. View