» Articles » PMID: 33299709

The Use of Multispectral Imaging in DIEP Free Flap Perforator Selection: A Case Study

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2020 Dec 10
PMID 33299709
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Perforator selection is of paramount importance when performing a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator flap. Technological advancements within imaging modalities have proved invaluable in preoperative planning and intraoperative assessment. Computed tomographic angiography remains the gold standard for preoperative perforator mapping, while color ultrasound Doppler is considered more reliable for determining vessel caliber. Intraoperatively, an imaging modality that provides sequential, real-time assessment of various perforators' supply to the flap would provide helpful insight to determine which perforator will optimize flap viability, especially of the most distal, lateral margins. Multispectral imaging, a variant of near infrared imaging, has emerged as an alternative method to assess tissue viability in the operating room as well as postoperatively. Unlike Spy technology, which is invasive and cost ineffective, the Snapshot (KD203) is a handheld multispectral imaging device utilizing NIR to measure the oxygenation of the hemoglobin in the area to calculate the tissue oxygen content (SO) displayed in a color image. The following case of a 46-year-old woman undergoing tertiary breast reconstruction for treatment of progressive grade 2 capsular contracture illustrates the utility and ease of KD203 application to intra-operative perforator determination in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap assessment.

Citing Articles

Uses of Smartphone Thermal Imaging in Perforator Flaps as a Versatile Intraoperative Tool: The Microsurgeon's Third Eye.

Yassin A, Kanapathy M, Khater A, El-Sabbagh A, Shouman O, Nikkhah D JPRAS Open. 2023; 38:98-108.

PMID: 37753532 PMC: 10518327. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.08.004.


Flap Viability Evaluation Using a Tissue Oximetry Camera as an Alternative to Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging.

Takaya A, Tsuge I, Nakano T, Yamanaka H, Katsube M, Sakamoto M Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023; 11(9):e5235.

PMID: 37681062 PMC: 10482079. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005235.


Vascular Mapping for Abdominal-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Current and Upcoming Imaging Modalities.

Ibelli T, Chennareddy S, Mandelbaum M, Henderson P Eplasty. 2023; 23:e44.

PMID: 37664815 PMC: 10472443.


Interpretation of Near-Infrared Imaging in Acute and Chronic Wound Care.

Arnold J, Marmolejo V Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(5).

PMID: 33925990 PMC: 8144992. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050778.

References
1.
Allen R, Treece P . Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 32(1):32-8. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199401000-00007. View

2.
Phillips B, Lanier S, Conkling N, Wang E, Dagum A, Ganz J . Intraoperative perfusion techniques can accurately predict mastectomy skin flap necrosis in breast reconstruction: results of a prospective trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129(5):778e-788e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2ae8. View

3.
Cina A, Salgarello M, Barone-Adesi L, Rinaldi P, Bonomo L . Planning breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforating vessels: multidetector CT angiography versus color Doppler US. Radiology. 2010; 255(3):979-87. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091166. View

4.
Aubry S, Pauchot J, Kastler A, Laurent O, Tropet Y, Runge M . Preoperative imaging in the planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap surgery. Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 42(3):319-27. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-012-1461-y. View

5.
Patel S, Keller A . A theoretical model describing arterial flow in the DIEP flap related to number and size of perforator vessels. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008; 61(11):1316-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.08.020. View