Reliability of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) on Cytological Smears in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Prospective Validation Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Introduction: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assessment is mandatory for the single agent pembrolizumab treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PD-L1 testing has been validated and is currently certified only on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded materials but not on cytological smears. Unfortunately, a significant proportion of patients, having only cytological material available, cannot be tested for PD-L1 and treated with pembrolizumab. In this study, we aimed to validate PD-L1 IHC on cytological smears prospectively by comparing clone SP263 staining in 150 paired histological samples and cytological smears of NSCLC patients.
Methods: We prospectively enrolled 150 consecutive advanced NSCLC patients. The clone SP263 was selected as, in a previous study of our group, it showed higher accuracy compared with clones 28-8 and 22-C3, with good cyto-histological agreement using a cut-off of 50%. For cyto-histological concordance, we calculated the kappa coefficient using two different cut-offs according to the percentage of PD-L1 positive neoplastic cells (<1%, 1-49% and ⩾50%; <50%, ⩾50%).
Results: The overall agreement between histological samples and cytological smears was moderate (kappa = 0.537). However, when the cyto-histological concordance was calculated using the cut-off of 50%, the agreement was good (kappa = 0.740). With the same cut-off, and assuming as gold-standard the results on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded materials, PD-L1 evaluation on smears showed specificity and negative predictive values of 98.1% and 93.9%, respectively.
Conclusion: Cytological smears can be used in routine clinical practice for PD-L1 assessment with a cut-off of 50%, expanding the potential pool of NSCLC patients as candidates for first-line single agent pembrolizumab therapy.
Francina M, Mikus M, Mamic M, Jovanovic T, Coric M, Lovric B Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(10).
PMID: 38786305 PMC: 11120294. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101007.
Wang X, He J, Li J, Wu C, Yue M, Niu S J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024; 150(2):43.
PMID: 38280970 PMC: 10821831. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05595-0.
From rough to precise: PD-L1 evaluation for predicting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockades.
Zhao X, Bao Y, Meng B, Xu Z, Li S, Wang X Front Immunol. 2022; 13:920021.
PMID: 35990664 PMC: 9382880. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.920021.
Program death ligand-1 immunocytochemistry in lung cancer cytological samples: A systematic review.
Satturwar S, Girolami I, Munari E, Ciompi F, Eccher A, Pantanowitz L Diagn Cytopathol. 2022; 50(6):313-323.
PMID: 35293692 PMC: 9310737. DOI: 10.1002/dc.24955.
The progress and challenge of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer.
Qu J, Mei Q, Liu L, Cheng T, Wang P, Chen L Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021; 13:1758835921992968.
PMID: 33643442 PMC: 7890731. DOI: 10.1177/1758835921992968.